Do Multimodal Large Language Models Truly See What We Point At? Investigating Indexical, Iconic, and Symbolic Gesture Comprehension

Understanding hand gestures is essential for human communication, yet it remains unclear how well multimodal large language models (MLLMs) comprehend them.In this paper, we examine MLLMs' ability to interpret indexical gestures, which require external referential grounding, in comparison to iconic gestures, which depict imagery, and symbolic gestures, which are conventionally defined.We hypothesize that MLLMs, lacking real-world referential understanding, will struggle significantly with indexical gestures.To test this, we manually annotated five gesture type labels to 925 gesture instances from the Miraikan SC Corpus and analyzed gesture descriptions generated by state-of-the-art MLLMs, including GPT-4o.Our findings reveal a consistent weakness across models in interpreting indexical gestures, suggesting that MLLMs rely heavily on linguistic priors or commonsense knowledge rather than grounding their interpretations in visual or contextual cues.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-short.40
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Multimodal Large Language Models Truly See What We Point At? Investigating Indexical, Iconic, and Symbolic Gesture Comprehension

Noriki Nishida, Hideki Nakayama, Katsuya Takanashi, Koji Inoue et al.
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

Do Multimodal Large Language Models Truly See What We Point At? Investigating Indexical, Iconic, and Symbolic Gesture Comprehension

Noriki Nishida, Hideki Nakayama, Katsuya Takanashi, Koji Inoue, Mayumi Bono
article en

Abstract

Understanding hand gestures is essential for human communication, yet it remains unclear how well multimodal large language models (MLLMs) comprehend them.In this paper, we examine MLLMs' ability to interpret indexical gestures, which require external referential grounding, in comparison to iconic gestures, which depict imagery, and symbolic gestures, which are conventionally defined.We hypothesize that MLLMs, lacking real-world referential understanding, will struggle significantly with indexical gestures.To test this, we manually annotated five gesture type labels to 925 gesture instances from the Miraikan SC Corpus and analyzed gesture descriptions generated by state-of-the-art MLLMs, including GPT-4o.Our findings reveal a consistent weakness across models in interpreting indexical gestures, suggesting that MLLMs rely heavily on linguistic priors or commonsense knowledge rather than grounding their interpretations in visual or contextual cues.

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.