Is That Your Final Answer? Test-Time Scaling Improves Selective Question Answering

Scaling the test-time compute of large language models has demonstrated impressive performance on reasoning benchmarks.However, existing evaluations of test-time scaling make the strong assumption that a reasoning system should always give an answer to any question provided.This overlooks concerns about whether a model is confident in its answer, and whether it is appropriate to always provide a response.To address these concerns, we extract confidence scores during reasoning for thresholding model responses.We find that increasing compute budget at inference time not only helps models answer more questions correctly, but also increases confidence in correct responses.We then extend the current paradigm of zero-risk responses during evaluation by considering settings with non-zero levels of response risk, and suggest a recipe for reporting evaluations under these settings. 1

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-short.50
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is That Your Final Answer? Test-Time Scaling Improves Selective Question Answering

Jeffrey Cheng, Benjamin Van Durme, William Jurayj
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
article

Is That Your Final Answer? Test-Time Scaling Improves Selective Question Answering

Jeffrey Cheng, Benjamin Van Durme, William Jurayj
article en

Abstract

Scaling the test-time compute of large language models has demonstrated impressive performance on reasoning benchmarks.However, existing evaluations of test-time scaling make the strong assumption that a reasoning system should always give an answer to any question provided.This overlooks concerns about whether a model is confident in its answer, and whether it is appropriate to always provide a response.To address these concerns, we extract confidence scores during reasoning for thresholding model responses.We find that increasing compute budget at inference time not only helps models answer more questions correctly, but also increases confidence in correct responses.We then extend the current paradigm of zero-risk responses during evaluation by considering settings with non-zero levels of response risk, and suggest a recipe for reporting evaluations under these settings. 1

Johns Hopkins University (US)
National Science Foundation, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is That Your Final Answer? Test-Time Scaling Improves Selective Question Answering — Jeffrey Cheng, Benjamin Van Durme, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS