Cross-Genre Learning for Old English Poetry POS Tagging

Poetry has always distinguished itself from other literary genres in many ways, including grammatically and syntactically.These differences are evident not only in modern literature but also in earlier stages.Linguistic analysis tools struggle to address these differences.This paper focuses on the dichotomy between Old English poetry and prose, specifically in the context of the POS tagging task.Two annotated corpora representing each genre were analyzed to show that there are several types of structural differences between Old English poetry and prose.For POS tagging, we conduct experiments on both a detailed tag set with over 200 tags and a mapping to the UPOS tag set with 17 tags.We establish a baseline and conduct two cross-genre experiments to investigate the effect of different proportions of prose and poetry data.Across both tag sets, our results indicate that if the divergence between two genres is substantial, simply increasing the quantity of training data from the support genre does not necessarily improve prediction accuracy.However, incorporating even a small amount of target data can lead to better performance compared to excluding it entirely.This study not only highlights the linguistic differences between Old English poetry and prose but also emphasizes the importance of developing effective NLP tools for underrepresented historical languages across all genres.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-srw.46
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-Genre Learning for Old English Poetry POS Tagging

Gregory R. Darwin, Sara Stymne, Irene Miani
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

Cross-Genre Learning for Old English Poetry POS Tagging

Gregory R. Darwin, Sara Stymne, Irene Miani
article en

Abstract

Poetry has always distinguished itself from other literary genres in many ways, including grammatically and syntactically.These differences are evident not only in modern literature but also in earlier stages.Linguistic analysis tools struggle to address these differences.This paper focuses on the dichotomy between Old English poetry and prose, specifically in the context of the POS tagging task.Two annotated corpora representing each genre were analyzed to show that there are several types of structural differences between Old English poetry and prose.For POS tagging, we conduct experiments on both a detailed tag set with over 200 tags and a mapping to the UPOS tag set with 17 tags.We establish a baseline and conduct two cross-genre experiments to investigate the effect of different proportions of prose and poetry data.Across both tag sets, our results indicate that if the divergence between two genres is substantial, simply increasing the quantity of training data from the support genre does not necessarily improve prediction accuracy.However, incorporating even a small amount of target data can lead to better performance compared to excluding it entirely.This study not only highlights the linguistic differences between Old English poetry and prose but also emphasizes the importance of developing effective NLP tools for underrepresented historical languages across all genres.

Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cross-Genre Learning for Old English Poetry POS Tagging — Gregory R. Darwin, Sara Stymne, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS