TriLLaMa at CQs-Gen 2025: A Two-Stage LLM-Based System for Critical Question Generation

This paper presents a new system for generating critical questions in debates, developed for the Critical Questions Generation shared task.Our two-stage approach, combining generation and classification, utilizes LLaMA 3.1 Instruct models (8B, 70B, 405B) with zero-/few-shot prompting.Evaluations on annotated debate data reveal several key insights: fewshot generation with 405B yielded relatively high-quality questions, achieving a maximum possible punctuation score of 73.5.The 70B model outperformed both smaller and larger variants on the classification part.The classifiers showed a strong bias toward labeling generated questions as Useful, despite limited validation.Further, our system, ranked 6 th , outperformed baselines by 3%.These findings stress the effectiveness of large-sized models for question generation and medium-sized models for classification, and suggest the need for clearer task definitions within prompts to improve classification accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.argmining-1.34
Primary Topic
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TriLLaMa at CQs-Gen 2025: A Two-Stage LLM-Based System for Critical Question Generation

Khalid Al‐Khatib, Frieso Turkstra, Sara Nabhani
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
article

TriLLaMa at CQs-Gen 2025: A Two-Stage LLM-Based System for Critical Question Generation

Khalid Al‐Khatib, Frieso Turkstra, Sara Nabhani
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a new system for generating critical questions in debates, developed for the Critical Questions Generation shared task.Our two-stage approach, combining generation and classification, utilizes LLaMA 3.1 Instruct models (8B, 70B, 405B) with zero-/few-shot prompting.Evaluations on annotated debate data reveal several key insights: fewshot generation with 405B yielded relatively high-quality questions, achieving a maximum possible punctuation score of 73.5.The 70B model outperformed both smaller and larger variants on the classification part.The classifiers showed a strong bias toward labeling generated questions as Useful, despite limited validation.Further, our system, ranked 6 th , outperformed baselines by 3%.These findings stress the effectiveness of large-sized models for question generation and medium-sized models for classification, and suggest the need for clearer task definitions within prompts to improve classification accuracy.

University of Groningen (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.