Mind_Matrix at CQs-Gen 2025: Adaptive Generation of Critical Questions for Argumentative Interventions

To encourage computational argumentation through critical question generation (CQs-Gen), we propose an ACL 2025 CQs-Gen shared task system to generate critical questions (CQs) with the best effort to counter argumentative text by discovering logical fallacies, unjustified assertions, and implicit assumptions.Our system integrates a quantized language model, semantic similarity analysis, and a metaevaluation feedback mechanism including the key stages such as data preprocessing, rationaleaugmented prompting to induce specificity, diversity filtering for redundancy elimination, enriched meta-evaluation for relevance, and a feedback-reflect-refine loop for iterative refinement.Multi-metric scoring guarantees highquality CQs.With robust error handling, our pipeline ranked 7th among 15 teams, outperforming baseline fact-checking approaches by enabling critical engagement and successfully detecting argumentative fallacies.This study presents an adaptive, scalable method that advances argument mining and critical discourse analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.argmining-1.32
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mind_Matrix at CQs-Gen 2025: Adaptive Generation of Critical Questions for Argumentative Interventions

Shafi Mahmud, Samia Rahman, Hasan Murad, Hossain Shahriar et al.
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
article

Mind_Matrix at CQs-Gen 2025: Adaptive Generation of Critical Questions for Argumentative Interventions

Shafi Mahmud, Samia Rahman, Hasan Murad, Hossain Shahriar, Momtazul Arefin Labib
article en

Abstract

To encourage computational argumentation through critical question generation (CQs-Gen), we propose an ACL 2025 CQs-Gen shared task system to generate critical questions (CQs) with the best effort to counter argumentative text by discovering logical fallacies, unjustified assertions, and implicit assumptions.Our system integrates a quantized language model, semantic similarity analysis, and a metaevaluation feedback mechanism including the key stages such as data preprocessing, rationaleaugmented prompting to induce specificity, diversity filtering for redundancy elimination, enriched meta-evaluation for relevance, and a feedback-reflect-refine loop for iterative refinement.Multi-metric scoring guarantees highquality CQs.With robust error handling, our pipeline ranked 7th among 15 teams, outperforming baseline fact-checking approaches by enabling critical engagement and successfully detecting argumentative fallacies.This study presents an adaptive, scalable method that advances argument mining and critical discourse analysis.

Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology (BD), University of Science and Technology Chittagong (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mind_Matrix at CQs-Gen 2025: Adaptive Generation of Critical Questions for Argumentative Interventions — Shafi Mahmud, Samia Rahman, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS