Webis at CQs-Gen 2025: Prompting and Reranking for Critical Questions

This paper reports on the submission of team Webis to the Critical Question Generation shared task at the 12th Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining 2025).Our approach is a fully automated two-stage pipeline that first prompts a large language model (LLM) to generate candidate critical questions for a given argumentative intervention, and then reranks the generated questions as per a classifier's confidence in their usefulness.For the generation stage, we tested zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought prompting strategies.For the reranking stage, we used a ModernBERT classifier that we fine-tuned on either the validation set or an augmented version.Among our submissions, the best-performing configuration achieved a test score of 0.57 and ranked 5th in the shared task.Submissions that use reranking consistently outperformed baseline submissions without reranking across all metrics.Our results demonstrate that combining openweight LLMs with reranking significantly improves the quality of the resulting critical questions.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.argmining-1.26
Primary Topic
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Webis at CQs-Gen 2025: Prompting and Reranking for Critical Questions

Maximilian Heinrich, Johannes Kiesel, Benno Stein, Midhun Kanadan
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
article

Webis at CQs-Gen 2025: Prompting and Reranking for Critical Questions

Maximilian Heinrich, Johannes Kiesel, Benno Stein, Midhun Kanadan
article en

Abstract

This paper reports on the submission of team Webis to the Critical Question Generation shared task at the 12th Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining 2025).Our approach is a fully automated two-stage pipeline that first prompts a large language model (LLM) to generate candidate critical questions for a given argumentative intervention, and then reranks the generated questions as per a classifier's confidence in their usefulness.For the generation stage, we tested zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought prompting strategies.For the reranking stage, we used a ModernBERT classifier that we fine-tuned on either the validation set or an augmented version.Among our submissions, the best-performing configuration achieved a test score of 0.57 and ranked 5th in the shared task.Submissions that use reranking consistently outperformed baseline submissions without reranking across all metrics.Our results demonstrate that combining openweight LLMs with reranking significantly improves the quality of the resulting critical questions.

Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.