LexiLogic at BEA 2025 Shared Task: Fine-tuning Transformer Language Models for the Pedagogical Skill Evaluation of LLM-based tutors

While large language models show promise as AI tutors, evaluating their pedagogical capabilities remains challenging.In this paper, we, team LexiLogic presents our participation in the BEA 2025 shared task on evaluating AI tutors across five dimensions: Mistake Identification, Mistake Location, Providing Guidance, Actionability, and Tutor Identification.We approach all tracks as classification tasks using fine-tuned transformer models on a dataset of 300 educational dialogues between a student and a tutor in the mathematical domain.Our results show varying performance across tracks, with macro average F1 scores ranging from 0.47 to 0.82, achieving rankings between 4th and 31st place.Such models have the potential to be used in developing automated scoring metrics for assessing the pedagogical skills of AI math tutors.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.bea-1.93
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LexiLogic at BEA 2025 Shared Task: Fine-tuning Transformer Language Models for the Pedagogical Skill Evaluation of LLM-based tutors

Souvik Bhattacharyya, Bhaswati Roy, M. Niranjan, Pranav Gupta
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

LexiLogic at BEA 2025 Shared Task: Fine-tuning Transformer Language Models for the Pedagogical Skill Evaluation of LLM-based tutors

Souvik Bhattacharyya, Bhaswati Roy, M. Niranjan, Pranav Gupta
article en

Abstract

While large language models show promise as AI tutors, evaluating their pedagogical capabilities remains challenging.In this paper, we, team LexiLogic presents our participation in the BEA 2025 shared task on evaluating AI tutors across five dimensions: Mistake Identification, Mistake Location, Providing Guidance, Actionability, and Tutor Identification.We approach all tracks as classification tasks using fine-tuned transformer models on a dataset of 300 educational dialogues between a student and a tutor in the mathematical domain.Our results show varying performance across tracks, with macro average F1 scores ranging from 0.47 to 0.82, achieving rankings between 4th and 31st place.Such models have the potential to be used in developing automated scoring metrics for assessing the pedagogical skills of AI math tutors.

Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.