Is Lunch Free Yet? Overcoming the Cold-Start Problem in Supervised Content Scoring using Zero-Shot LLM-Generated Training Data

In this work, we assess the potential of using synthetic data to train models for content scoring.We generate a parallel corpus of LLMgenerated data for the SRA dataset.In our experiments, we train three different kinds of models (Logistic Regression, BERT, SBERT) with this data, examining their respective ability to bridge between generated training data and student-authored test data.We also explore the effects of generating larger volumes of training data than what is available in the original dataset.Overall, we find that training models from LLM-generated data outperforms zero-shot scoring of the test data with an LLM.Still, the fine-tuned models perform much worse than models trained on the original data, largely because the LLM-generated answers often do not to conform to the desired labels.However, once the data is manually relabeled, competitive models can be trained from it.With a similarity-based scoring approach, the relabeled (larger) amount of synthetic answers consistently yields a model that surpasses performance of training on the (limited) amount of answers available in the original dataset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.bea-1.11
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Lunch Free Yet? Overcoming the Cold-Start Problem in Supervised Content Scoring using Zero-Shot LLM-Generated Training Data

Marie Bexte, Torsten Zesch
Topic Modeling
article

Is Lunch Free Yet? Overcoming the Cold-Start Problem in Supervised Content Scoring using Zero-Shot LLM-Generated Training Data

Marie Bexte, Torsten Zesch
article en

Abstract

In this work, we assess the potential of using synthetic data to train models for content scoring.We generate a parallel corpus of LLMgenerated data for the SRA dataset.In our experiments, we train three different kinds of models (Logistic Regression, BERT, SBERT) with this data, examining their respective ability to bridge between generated training data and student-authored test data.We also explore the effects of generating larger volumes of training data than what is available in the original dataset.Overall, we find that training models from LLM-generated data outperforms zero-shot scoring of the test data with an LLM.Still, the fine-tuned models perform much worse than models trained on the original data, largely because the LLM-generated answers often do not to conform to the desired labels.However, once the data is manually relabeled, competitive models can be trained from it.With a similarity-based scoring approach, the relabeled (larger) amount of synthetic answers consistently yields a model that surpasses performance of training on the (limited) amount of answers available in the original dataset.

FernUniversität in Hagen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.