EMULATE: A Multi-Agent Framework for Determining the Veracity of Atomic Claims by Emulating Human Actions

Determining the veracity of atomic claims is an imperative component of many recently proposed fact-checking systems.Many approaches tackle this problem by first retrieving evidence by querying a search engine and then performing classification by providing the evidence set and atomic claim to a large language model, but this process deviates from what a human would do in order to perform the task.Recent work attempted to address this issue by proposing iterative evidence retrieval, allowing for evidence to be collected several times and only when necessary.Continuing along this line of research, we propose a novel claim verification system, called EMULATE, which is designed to better emulate human actions through the use of a multiagent framework where each agent performs a small part of the larger task, such as ranking search results according to predefined criteria or evaluating webpage content.Extensive experiments on several benchmarks show clear improvements over prior work, demonstrating the efficacy of our new multi-agent framework.Our code is available at https: //github.com/qqqube/EMULATE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.fever-1.13
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EMULATE: A Multi-Agent Framework for Determining the Veracity of Atomic Claims by Emulating Human Actions

Sang Gi Hong, Meng Luo, Xinyi Wan
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

EMULATE: A Multi-Agent Framework for Determining the Veracity of Atomic Claims by Emulating Human Actions

Sang Gi Hong, Meng Luo, Xinyi Wan
article en

Abstract

Determining the veracity of atomic claims is an imperative component of many recently proposed fact-checking systems.Many approaches tackle this problem by first retrieving evidence by querying a search engine and then performing classification by providing the evidence set and atomic claim to a large language model, but this process deviates from what a human would do in order to perform the task.Recent work attempted to address this issue by proposing iterative evidence retrieval, allowing for evidence to be collected several times and only when necessary.Continuing along this line of research, we propose a novel claim verification system, called EMULATE, which is designed to better emulate human actions through the use of a multiagent framework where each agent performs a small part of the larger task, such as ranking search results according to predefined criteria or evaluating webpage content.Extensive experiments on several benchmarks show clear improvements over prior work, demonstrating the efficacy of our new multi-agent framework.Our code is available at https: //github.com/qqqube/EMULATE.

National University of Singapore (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

EMULATE: A Multi-Agent Framework for Determining the Veracity of Atomic Claims by Emulating Human Actions — Sang Gi Hong, Meng Luo, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS