What is an “Abstract Reasoner”? Revisiting Experiments and Arguments about Large Language Models

Recent work has argued that large language models (LLMs) are not "abstract reasoners", citing their poor zero-shot performance on a variety of challenging tasks as evidence.We revisit these experiments in order to add nuance to the claim.First, we show that while LLMs indeed perform poorly in a zero-shot setting, even tuning a small subset of parameters for input encoding can enable near-perfect performance.However, we also show that this finetuning does not necessarily transfer across datasets.We take this collection of empirical results as an invitation to (re-)open the discussion of what it means to be an "abstract reasoner", and why it matters whether LLMs fit the bill. 1