What does memory retrieval leave on the table? Modelling the Cost of Semi-Compositionality with MINERVA2 and sBERT
Despite being ubiquitous in natural language, collocations (e.g., kick+habit) incur a unique processing cost, compared to compositional phrases (kick+door) and idioms (kick+bucket).We confirm this cost with behavioural data as well as MINERVA2, a memory model, suggesting that collocations constitute a distinct linguistic category.While the model fails to fully capture the observed human processing patterns, we find that below a specific item frequency threshold, the model's retrieval failures align with human reaction times across conditions.This suggests an alternative processing mechanism that activates when memory retrieval fails.
Authors
- Francis Mollica (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1008-5397)
- Leonidas A. A. Doumas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4048-6282)
- Sydelle de Souza (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6330-5763)
- Ivan Vegner
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.conll-1.19
- Primary Topic
- Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- UK Research and Innovation
- Universidade de Lisboa
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia