SPICA: Retrieving Scenarios for Pluralistic In-Context Alignment

When different groups' values differ, one approach to model alignment is to steer models at inference time towards each group's preferences.However, techniques like in-context learning only consider similarity when drawing few-shot examples and not cross-group differences in values.We propose SPICA, a framework that accounts for group-level differences during in-context example retrieval.SPICA introduces three designs: scenario banks, groupinformed retrieval metrics, and in-context alignment prompts.From an evaluation of SPICA on an alignment task collecting inputs from four demographic groups (n = 544), our metrics retrieve in-context examples that more closely match observed preferences, with the best prompt configuration using multiple contrastive responses to demonstrate examples.In an endto-end evaluation (n = 120), we observe that SPICA is higher rated than similarity-based retrieval, with groups seeing up to a +0.16 point improvement on a 5 point scale.Additionally, gains from SPICA were more uniform, with all groups benefiting from alignment rather than only some.Finally, we find that while a groupagnostic approach can align to aggregated values, it is not most suited for divergent groups. 1