Graph-of-Thoughts for Fact-Checking with Large Language Models

We present a fact-checking system developed for the 2025 Automated Verification of Textual Claims (AVeriTeC) shared task, leveraging the Graph-of-Thoughts (GoT) prompting scheme.The GoT approach facilitates iterative refinement during fact-checking by conditioning question generation on previous answers and enabling the incorporation of multiple evidence documents per question, thereby mitigating the impact of factually incorrect evidence.The efficiency requirements of the shared task are addressed by restricting the width and depth of the thought graph.Additionally, an efficient stopping criterion is derived from the dataset's Not Enough Information (NEI) label.Our system utilizes fine-tuned open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) for question generation, question answering, and final verdict prediction.Empirical results demonstrate competitive performance against top-performing systems in the AVeriTeC shared task and improvements over the baseline method.Our code is publicly available 1 .

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.fever-1.21
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Graph-of-Thoughts for Fact-Checking with Large Language Models

Jin Liu, Sascha Rolinger
Topic Modeling
article

Graph-of-Thoughts for Fact-Checking with Large Language Models

Jin Liu, Sascha Rolinger
article en

Abstract

We present a fact-checking system developed for the 2025 Automated Verification of Textual Claims (AVeriTeC) shared task, leveraging the Graph-of-Thoughts (GoT) prompting scheme.The GoT approach facilitates iterative refinement during fact-checking by conditioning question generation on previous answers and enabling the incorporation of multiple evidence documents per question, thereby mitigating the impact of factually incorrect evidence.The efficiency requirements of the shared task are addressed by restricting the width and depth of the thought graph.Additionally, an efficient stopping criterion is derived from the dataset's Not Enough Information (NEI) label.Our system utilizes fine-tuned open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) for question generation, question answering, and final verdict prediction.Empirical results demonstrate competitive performance against top-performing systems in the AVeriTeC shared task and improvements over the baseline method.Our code is publicly available 1 .

Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.