The Two Paradigms of LLM Detection: Authorship Attribution vs. Authorship Verification

The detection of texts generated by LLMs has quickly become an important research problem.Many supervised and zero-shot detectors have already been proposed, yet their effectiveness and precision remain disputed.Current research therefore focuses on making detectors robust against domain shifts and on building corresponding benchmarks.In this paper, we show that the actual limitations hindering progress in LLM detection lie elsewhere: LLM detection is often implicitly modeled as an authorship attribution task, while its true nature is that of authorship verification.We systematically analyze the current research with respect to this misunderstanding, conduct an in-depth comparative analysis of the benchmarks, and validate our claim using state-of-the-art LLM detectors.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.194
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Two Paradigms of LLM Detection: Authorship Attribution vs. Authorship Verification

Ernst Peter Richter, Matti Wiegmann, Janek Bevendorff, Martin Potthast et al.
3 citations
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
7.44
article

The Two Paradigms of LLM Detection: Authorship Attribution vs. Authorship Verification

Ernst Peter Richter, Matti Wiegmann, Janek Bevendorff, Martin Potthast, Benno Stein
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The detection of texts generated by LLMs has quickly become an important research problem.Many supervised and zero-shot detectors have already been proposed, yet their effectiveness and precision remain disputed.Current research therefore focuses on making detectors robust against domain shifts and on building corresponding benchmarks.In this paper, we show that the actual limitations hindering progress in LLM detection lie elsewhere: LLM detection is often implicitly modeled as an authorship attribution task, while its true nature is that of authorship verification.We systematically analyze the current research with respect to this misunderstanding, conduct an in-depth comparative analysis of the benchmarks, and validate our claim using state-of-the-art LLM detectors.

European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Two Paradigms of LLM Detection: Authorship Attribution vs. Authorship Verification — Ernst Peter Richter, Matti Wiegmann, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS