UQ-Merge: Uncertainty Guided Multimodal Large Language Model Merging

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have gained increasing popularity as a promising framework for leveraging the strong language reasoning capabilities in the visionlanguage domain.Given a wide range of MLLMs, model merging potentially offers a cheap way to aggregate their diverse knowledge into a single MLLM.However, directly plug-in existing model merging approaches often leads to suboptimal performance due to (1) inclusion of harmful models that have over-confident predictions in the target task;(2) the lack of specialized designs for visionlanguage inputs.To tackle these pain points, we conduct pioneering investigations to dissect the merging procedures and propose an uncertainty-guided MLLM merging algorithm, i.e., UQ-Merge, which i) identifies beneficial candidates for merging, ii) determines the merging order and the number of helpful candidates, and iii) performs appropriate merging.Within our framework, we consider uncertainty quantification on both text and vision inputs to examine the MLLM prediction confidence, and then decide whether and when a MLLM needs to be included.It is worth mentioning that our vision-language uncertainty quantification does not require access to sample labels, making it more practical in various scenarios.Extensive experiments consistently demonstrate the superior MLLM merging performance of UQ-Merge in both held-in and held-out visionlanguage benchmarks.For example, compared to existing state-of-the-art merging methods, UQ-Merge brings substantial performance improvements of up to 44.3% on average accuracy in 12 datasets.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.73
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

UQ-Merge: Uncertainty Guided Multimodal Large Language Model Merging

Kwonjoon Lee, Behzad Dariush, Xingyu Zhao, Huaizhi Qu et al.
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

UQ-Merge: Uncertainty Guided Multimodal Large Language Model Merging

Kwonjoon Lee, Behzad Dariush, Xingyu Zhao, Huaizhi Qu, Tianlong Chen, Jie Peng
article en

Abstract

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have gained increasing popularity as a promising framework for leveraging the strong language reasoning capabilities in the visionlanguage domain.Given a wide range of MLLMs, model merging potentially offers a cheap way to aggregate their diverse knowledge into a single MLLM.However, directly plug-in existing model merging approaches often leads to suboptimal performance due to (1) inclusion of harmful models that have over-confident predictions in the target task;(2) the lack of specialized designs for visionlanguage inputs.To tackle these pain points, we conduct pioneering investigations to dissect the merging procedures and propose an uncertainty-guided MLLM merging algorithm, i.e., UQ-Merge, which i) identifies beneficial candidates for merging, ii) determines the merging order and the number of helpful candidates, and iii) performs appropriate merging.Within our framework, we consider uncertainty quantification on both text and vision inputs to examine the MLLM prediction confidence, and then decide whether and when a MLLM needs to be included.It is worth mentioning that our vision-language uncertainty quantification does not require access to sample labels, making it more practical in various scenarios.Extensive experiments consistently demonstrate the superior MLLM merging performance of UQ-Merge in both held-in and held-out visionlanguage benchmarks.For example, compared to existing state-of-the-art merging methods, UQ-Merge brings substantial performance improvements of up to 44.3% on average accuracy in 12 datasets.

Honda Research Institute, USA
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.