STEM-POM: Evaluating Language Models Math-Symbol Reasoning in Document Parsing

Advances in large language models (LLMs) have spurred research into enhancing their reasoning capabilities, particularly in mathrich STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) documents.While LLMs can generate equations or solve mathrelated queries, their ability to fully understand and interpret abstract mathematical symbols in long, math-rich documents remains limited.In this paper, we introduce STEM-POM, a comprehensive benchmark dataset designed to evaluate LLMs' reasoning abilities on math symbols within contextual scientific text.The dataset, sourced from realworld ArXiv documents, contains over 2K math symbols classified as main attributes of variables, constants, operators, and unit descriptors, with additional sub-attributes including scalar/vector/matrix for variables and local/global/discipline-specific labels for both constants and operators.Our extensive experiments demonstrate that state-of-the-art LLMs achieve an average accuracy of 20-60% under in-context learning and 50-60% with finetuning, highlighting a substantial gap in their ability to classify mathematical symbols.By improving LLMs' mathematical symbol classification, STEM-POM further enhances models' downstream mathematical reasoning capabilities.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.429
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

STEM-POM: Evaluating Language Models Math-Symbol Reasoning in Document Parsing

Nickvash Kani, Jiaru Zou, Pratyush Thakur, Qing Wang
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

STEM-POM: Evaluating Language Models Math-Symbol Reasoning in Document Parsing

Nickvash Kani, Jiaru Zou, Pratyush Thakur, Qing Wang
article en

Abstract

Advances in large language models (LLMs) have spurred research into enhancing their reasoning capabilities, particularly in mathrich STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) documents.While LLMs can generate equations or solve mathrelated queries, their ability to fully understand and interpret abstract mathematical symbols in long, math-rich documents remains limited.In this paper, we introduce STEM-POM, a comprehensive benchmark dataset designed to evaluate LLMs' reasoning abilities on math symbols within contextual scientific text.The dataset, sourced from realworld ArXiv documents, contains over 2K math symbols classified as main attributes of variables, constants, operators, and unit descriptors, with additional sub-attributes including scalar/vector/matrix for variables and local/global/discipline-specific labels for both constants and operators.Our extensive experiments demonstrate that state-of-the-art LLMs achieve an average accuracy of 20-60% under in-context learning and 50-60% with finetuning, highlighting a substantial gap in their ability to classify mathematical symbols.By improving LLMs' mathematical symbol classification, STEM-POM further enhances models' downstream mathematical reasoning capabilities.

Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.