Supervised Optimism Correction: Be Confident When LLMs Are Sure

In this work, we establish a novel theoretical connection between supervised fine-tuning and offline reinforcement learning under the tokenlevel Markov decision process, revealing that large language models indeed learn an implicit Q-function for inference.Through this theoretical lens, we demonstrate that the widely used beam search method suffers from unacceptable over-optimism, where inference errors are inevitably amplified due to inflated Q-value estimations of suboptimal steps.To address this limitation, we propose Supervised Optimism Correction (SOC), which introduces a simple yet effective auxiliary loss for token-level Qvalue estimations during supervised fine-tuning.Specifically, the auxiliary loss employs implicit value regularization to boost model confidence in expert-demonstrated responses, thereby suppressing over-optimism toward insufficiently supervised responses.Extensive experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks, including GSM8K, MATH, and GAOKAO, showcase the superiority of the proposed SOC with beam search across a series of open-source models.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.463
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supervised Optimism Correction: Be Confident When LLMs Are Sure

Fei Huang, Ting-En Lin, Dacheng Tao, Shunyu Liu et al.
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Supervised Optimism Correction: Be Confident When LLMs Are Sure

Fei Huang, Ting-En Lin, Dacheng Tao, Shunyu Liu, Yi Chen, Yongbin Li, Junjie Zhang, Rushuai Yang
article en

Abstract

In this work, we establish a novel theoretical connection between supervised fine-tuning and offline reinforcement learning under the tokenlevel Markov decision process, revealing that large language models indeed learn an implicit Q-function for inference.Through this theoretical lens, we demonstrate that the widely used beam search method suffers from unacceptable over-optimism, where inference errors are inevitably amplified due to inflated Q-value estimations of suboptimal steps.To address this limitation, we propose Supervised Optimism Correction (SOC), which introduces a simple yet effective auxiliary loss for token-level Qvalue estimations during supervised fine-tuning.Specifically, the auxiliary loss employs implicit value regularization to boost model confidence in expert-demonstrated responses, thereby suppressing over-optimism toward insufficiently supervised responses.Extensive experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks, including GSM8K, MATH, and GAOKAO, showcase the superiority of the proposed SOC with beam search across a series of open-source models.

Nanyang Technological University
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.