McBE: A Multi-task Chinese Bias Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models

Warning: This paper contains content that may be offensive or harmful As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to various NLP tasks, their inherent biases are gradually disclosed.Therefore, measuring biases in LLMs is crucial to mitigate its ethical risks.However, most existing bias evaluation datasets are focus on English and North American culture, and their bias categories are not fully applicable to other cultures.The datasets grounded in the Chinese language and culture are scarce.More importantly, these datasets usually only support single evaluation task and cannot evaluate the bias from multiple aspects in LLMs.To address these issues, we present a Multi-task Chinese Bias Evaluation Benchmark (McBE) that includes 4,077 bias evaluation instances, covering 12 single bias categories, 82 subcategories and introducing 5 evaluation tasks, providing extensive category coverage, content diversity, and measuring comprehensiveness.Additionally, we evaluate several popular LLMs from different series and with parameter sizes.In general, all these LLMs demonstrated varying degrees of bias.We conduct an in-depth analysis of results, offering novel insights into bias in LLMs.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.313
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

McBE: A Multi-task Chinese Bias Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models

Xiangdong Su, Li Jiang, Guanglai Gao, Ke Chang et al.
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

McBE: A Multi-task Chinese Bias Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models

Xiangdong Su, Li Jiang, Guanglai Gao, Ke Chang, Tian Lan, Ruirui Wang, Xu Liu
article en

Abstract

Warning: This paper contains content that may be offensive or harmful As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to various NLP tasks, their inherent biases are gradually disclosed.Therefore, measuring biases in LLMs is crucial to mitigate its ethical risks.However, most existing bias evaluation datasets are focus on English and North American culture, and their bias categories are not fully applicable to other cultures.The datasets grounded in the Chinese language and culture are scarce.More importantly, these datasets usually only support single evaluation task and cannot evaluate the bias from multiple aspects in LLMs.To address these issues, we present a Multi-task Chinese Bias Evaluation Benchmark (McBE) that includes 4,077 bias evaluation instances, covering 12 single bias categories, 82 subcategories and introducing 5 evaluation tasks, providing extensive category coverage, content diversity, and measuring comprehensiveness.Additionally, we evaluate several popular LLMs from different series and with parameter sizes.In general, all these LLMs demonstrated varying degrees of bias.We conduct an in-depth analysis of results, offering novel insights into bias in LLMs.

National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

McBE: A Multi-task Chinese Bias Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models — Xiangdong Su, Li Jiang, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS