MiLiC-Eval: Benchmarking Multilingual LLMs for China’s Minority Languages

Large language models (LLMs) excel in highresource languages but struggle with lowresource languages (LRLs), particularly those spoken by minority communities in China, such as Tibetan, Uyghur, Kazakh, and Mongolian.To systematically track the progress in these languages, we introduce MiLiC-Eval, a benchmark designed for minority languages in China, featuring 24K instances across 9 tasks.MiLiC-Eval focuses on underrepresented writing systems.Its parallelism between tasks and languages can provide a faithful and fine-grained assessment of linguistic and problem-solving skills.Our evaluation reveals that open-source LLMs perform poorly on syntax-intensive tasks and multi-script languages.We further demonstrate how MiLiC-Eval can help advance LRL research in handling diverse writing systems and understanding the process of language adaptation 1 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.578
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MiLiC-Eval: Benchmarking Multilingual LLMs for China’s Minority Languages

Zhiyuan Liao, Mingxu Tao, Chen Zhang, Yansong Feng
1 citations
Natural Language Processing Techniques
2.48
article

MiLiC-Eval: Benchmarking Multilingual LLMs for China’s Minority Languages

Zhiyuan Liao, Mingxu Tao, Chen Zhang, Yansong Feng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) excel in highresource languages but struggle with lowresource languages (LRLs), particularly those spoken by minority communities in China, such as Tibetan, Uyghur, Kazakh, and Mongolian.To systematically track the progress in these languages, we introduce MiLiC-Eval, a benchmark designed for minority languages in China, featuring 24K instances across 9 tasks.MiLiC-Eval focuses on underrepresented writing systems.Its parallelism between tasks and languages can provide a faithful and fine-grained assessment of linguistic and problem-solving skills.Our evaluation reveals that open-source LLMs perform poorly on syntax-intensive tasks and multi-script languages.We further demonstrate how MiLiC-Eval can help advance LRL research in handling diverse writing systems and understanding the process of language adaptation 1 .

King University (US)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

MiLiC-Eval: Benchmarking Multilingual LLMs for China’s Minority Languages — Zhiyuan Liao, Mingxu Tao, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS