RelEdit: Evaluating Conceptual Knowledge Editing in Language Models via Relational Reasoning

The conceptual knowledge in Large Language Models (LLMs) can become outdated over time, and concept editing is often an option.Current evaluations on conceptual knowledge editing primarily focus on whether the definitions of concepts are successfully edited, neglecting the impact on the model's related beliefs.To address this gap, we introduce a benchmark called RelEdit, which includes criteria and questions to assess both concept-level and instance-level relational reasoning abilities of edited models.Our findings reveal that existing knowledge editing methods struggle to reason about related conceptual knowledge effectively.Additionally, we introduce a simple memory-based in-context editing baseline, MICE, which prompts the language model to generate answers that align with the stored edited concepts in external memory.In addition, we find that MICE obtains the best scores on our benchmark, suggesting a promising research direction for model editing.The code is available at https://github.com/ivanniu/RelEdit.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.533
Primary Topic
Semantic Web and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RelEdit: Evaluating Conceptual Knowledge Editing in Language Models via Relational Reasoning

Tingyang Xu, Yifan Niu, Jia Li, Nuo Chen et al.
Semantic Web and Ontologies
article

RelEdit: Evaluating Conceptual Knowledge Editing in Language Models via Relational Reasoning

Tingyang Xu, Yifan Niu, Jia Li, Nuo Chen, Peng Miao, Yatao Bian
article en

Abstract

The conceptual knowledge in Large Language Models (LLMs) can become outdated over time, and concept editing is often an option.Current evaluations on conceptual knowledge editing primarily focus on whether the definitions of concepts are successfully edited, neglecting the impact on the model's related beliefs.To address this gap, we introduce a benchmark called RelEdit, which includes criteria and questions to assess both concept-level and instance-level relational reasoning abilities of edited models.Our findings reveal that existing knowledge editing methods struggle to reason about related conceptual knowledge effectively.Additionally, we introduce a simple memory-based in-context editing baseline, MICE, which prompts the language model to generate answers that align with the stored edited concepts in external memory.In addition, we find that MICE obtains the best scores on our benchmark, suggesting a promising research direction for model editing.The code is available at https://github.com/ivanniu/RelEdit.

Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Semantic Web and Ontologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

RelEdit: Evaluating Conceptual Knowledge Editing in Language Models via Relational Reasoning — Tingyang Xu, Yifan Niu, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS