VAQUUM: Are Vague Quantifiers Grounded in Visual Data?

Vague quantifiers such as a few and many are influenced by various contextual factors, including the number of objects present in a given context.In this work, we evaluate the extent to which vision-and-language models (VLMs) are compatible with humans when producing or judging the appropriateness of vague quantifiers in visual contexts.We release a novel dataset, VAQUUM, containing 20,300 human ratings on quantified statements across a total of 1089 images.Using this dataset, we compare human judgments and VLM predictions using three different evaluation methods.Our findings show that VLMs, like humans, are influenced by object counts in vague quantifier use.However, we find significant inconsistencies across models in different evaluation settings, suggesting that judging and producing vague quantifiers rely on two different processes.We release our dataset and code at https://github.com/hughmee/vaquum. How accurate is

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.619
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

VAQUUM: Are Vague Quantifiers Grounded in Visual Data?

Rick Nouwen, Albert Gatt, Hung Wong
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
article

VAQUUM: Are Vague Quantifiers Grounded in Visual Data?

Rick Nouwen, Albert Gatt, Hung Wong
article en

Abstract

Vague quantifiers such as a few and many are influenced by various contextual factors, including the number of objects present in a given context.In this work, we evaluate the extent to which vision-and-language models (VLMs) are compatible with humans when producing or judging the appropriateness of vague quantifiers in visual contexts.We release a novel dataset, VAQUUM, containing 20,300 human ratings on quantified statements across a total of 1089 images.Using this dataset, we compare human judgments and VLM predictions using three different evaluation methods.Our findings show that VLMs, like humans, are influenced by object counts in vague quantifier use.However, we find significant inconsistencies across models in different evaluation settings, suggesting that judging and producing vague quantifiers rely on two different processes.We release our dataset and code at https://github.com/hughmee/vaquum. How accurate is

Utrecht University (NL)
Universiteit Utrecht, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.