Monitoring Decoding: Mitigating Hallucination via Evaluating the Factuality of Partial Response during Generation

While large language models have demonstrated exceptional performance across a wide range of tasks, they remain susceptible to hallucinations -generating plausible yet factually incorrect contents.Existing methods to mitigating such risk often rely on sampling multiple full-length generations, which introduces significant response latency and becomes ineffective when the model consistently produces hallucinated outputs with high confidence.To address these limitations, we introduce Monitoring Decoding (MD), a novel framework that dynamically monitors the generation process and selectively applies in-process interventions, focusing on revising crucial tokens responsible for hallucinations.Instead of waiting until completion of multiple full-length generations, we identify hallucination-prone tokens during generation using a monitor function, and further refine these tokens through a tree-based decoding strategy.This approach ensures an enhanced factual accuracy and coherence in the generated output while maintaining efficiency.Experimental results demonstrate that MD consistently outperforms self-consistencybased approaches in both effectiveness and efficiency, achieving higher factual accuracy while significantly reducing computational overhead.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.752
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitoring Decoding: Mitigating Hallucination via Evaluating the Factuality of Partial Response during Generation

Lu Lin, Bochuan Cao, Yurui Chang
Mental Health Research Topics
article

Monitoring Decoding: Mitigating Hallucination via Evaluating the Factuality of Partial Response during Generation

Lu Lin, Bochuan Cao, Yurui Chang
article en

Abstract

While large language models have demonstrated exceptional performance across a wide range of tasks, they remain susceptible to hallucinations -generating plausible yet factually incorrect contents.Existing methods to mitigating such risk often rely on sampling multiple full-length generations, which introduces significant response latency and becomes ineffective when the model consistently produces hallucinated outputs with high confidence.To address these limitations, we introduce Monitoring Decoding (MD), a novel framework that dynamically monitors the generation process and selectively applies in-process interventions, focusing on revising crucial tokens responsible for hallucinations.Instead of waiting until completion of multiple full-length generations, we identify hallucination-prone tokens during generation using a monitor function, and further refine these tokens through a tree-based decoding strategy.This approach ensures an enhanced factual accuracy and coherence in the generated output while maintaining efficiency.Experimental results demonstrate that MD consistently outperforms self-consistencybased approaches in both effectiveness and efficiency, achieving higher factual accuracy while significantly reducing computational overhead.

Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Monitoring Decoding: Mitigating Hallucination via Evaluating the Factuality of Partial Response during Generation — Lu Lin, Bochuan Cao, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS