Mechanistic Interpretability of Emotion Inference in Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) show promising capabilities in predicting human emotions from text.However, the mechanisms through which these models process emotional stimuli remain largely unexplored.Our study addresses this gap by investigating how autoregressive LLMs infer emotions, showing that emotion representations are functionally localized to specific regions in the model.Our evaluation includes diverse model families and sizes, and is supported by robustness checks.We then show that the identified representations are psychologically plausible by drawing on cognitive appraisal theory-a well-established psychological framework positing that emotions emerge from evaluations (appraisals) of environmental stimuli.By causally intervening on construed appraisal concepts, we steer the generation and show that the outputs align with theoretical and intuitive expectations.This work highlights a novel way to causally intervene and control emotion inference, potentially benefiting safety and alignment in sensitive affective domains.Code at: GitHub repo.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.679
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanistic Interpretability of Emotion Inference in Large Language Models

Robin Jia, Ala Nekouvaght Tak, Anahita Bolourani, Mina Kian et al.
3 citations
Topic Modeling
7.44
article

Mechanistic Interpretability of Emotion Inference in Large Language Models

Robin Jia, Ala Nekouvaght Tak, Anahita Bolourani, Mina Kian, Jonathan Gratch, Amin Banayeeanzade
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) show promising capabilities in predicting human emotions from text.However, the mechanisms through which these models process emotional stimuli remain largely unexplored.Our study addresses this gap by investigating how autoregressive LLMs infer emotions, showing that emotion representations are functionally localized to specific regions in the model.Our evaluation includes diverse model families and sizes, and is supported by robustness checks.We then show that the identified representations are psychologically plausible by drawing on cognitive appraisal theory-a well-established psychological framework positing that emotions emerge from evaluations (appraisals) of environmental stimuli.By causally intervening on construed appraisal concepts, we steer the generation and show that the outputs align with theoretical and intuitive expectations.This work highlights a novel way to causally intervene and control emotion inference, potentially benefiting safety and alignment in sensitive affective domains.Code at: GitHub repo.

Army Research Office
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Topic Modeling
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mechanistic Interpretability of Emotion Inference in Large Language Models — Robin Jia, Ala Nekouvaght Tak, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS