ReasonerRank: Redefining Language Model Evaluation with Ground-Truth-Free Ranking Frameworks
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted across real-world applications, yet traditional evaluations rely on expensive, domain-specific ground-truth labels that are often unavailable or infeasible.We introduce a ground-truth-free evaluation framework focused on reasoning consistency and instruction following, shifting the emphasis from correctness-which is elusive without labels-to transparent, coherent, evidence-based reasoning.Each model response includes a direct answer, a structured multi-step explanation, and supporting evidence, all assessed via semantic similarity and output adherence checks.We further propose TopK-ReRank, which refines rankings by constructing a consensus answer from the most reliable models, reducing ambiguity across diverse reasoning styles.Experiments show that our framework outperforms existing label-free methods, including majority voting, triplet ranking, and peer-review approaches, providing a more interpretable and efficient alternative for evaluating LLMs in the absence of ground-truth labels.Our code is available at https://github.com/MorrisZJ/ ReasonerRank.
Authors
- Huong Thi Le (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2913-7065)
- Jiwen Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8060-6824)
- Soo-Hyun Choi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5768-9978)
- Rui Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1641-8562)
- Yu-Neng Chuang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7492-0817)
- Andrew Wen
- Jiayi Yuan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0121-4990)
- Xia Hu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2234-3226)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.700
- Primary Topic
- Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Science Foundation