Lost in Translation: Benchmarking Commercial Machine Translation Models for Dyslexic-Style Text

Dyslexia can affect writing, leading to unique patterns such as letter and homophone swapping.As a result, text produced by people with dyslexia often differs from the text typically used to train natural language processing (NLP) models, raising concerns about their effectiveness for dyslexic users.This paper examines the fairness of four commercial machine translation (MT) systems towards dyslexic text through a systematic audit using both synthetically generated dyslexic text and real writing from individuals with dyslexia.By programmatically introducing various dyslexic-style errors into the WMT dataset, we present insights on how dyslexic biases manifest in MT systems as the text becomes more dyslexic, especially with real-word errors.Our results shed light on the NLP biases affecting people with dyslexia -a population that often relies on NLP tools as assistive technologies, highlighting the need for more diverse data and user representation in the development of foundational NLP models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.708
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Text Readability and Simplification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lost in Translation: Benchmarking Commercial Machine Translation Models for Dyslexic-Style Text

Shaomei Wu, Gregory Price
1 citations
Text Readability and Simplification
2.48
article

Lost in Translation: Benchmarking Commercial Machine Translation Models for Dyslexic-Style Text

Shaomei Wu, Gregory Price
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Dyslexia can affect writing, leading to unique patterns such as letter and homophone swapping.As a result, text produced by people with dyslexia often differs from the text typically used to train natural language processing (NLP) models, raising concerns about their effectiveness for dyslexic users.This paper examines the fairness of four commercial machine translation (MT) systems towards dyslexic text through a systematic audit using both synthetically generated dyslexic text and real writing from individuals with dyslexia.By programmatically introducing various dyslexic-style errors into the WMT dataset, we present insights on how dyslexic biases manifest in MT systems as the text becomes more dyslexic, especially with real-word errors.Our results shed light on the NLP biases affecting people with dyslexia -a population that often relies on NLP tools as assistive technologies, highlighting the need for more diverse data and user representation in the development of foundational NLP models.

Mountain View College (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Text Readability and Simplification
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.