MMSciBench: Benchmarking Language Models on Chinese Multimodal Scientific Problems

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (LVLMs) have shown promise across many tasks, yet their scientific reasoning capabilities remain untested, particularly in multimodal settings.We present MMSciBench, a benchmark for evaluating mathematical and physical reasoning through text-only and text-image formats, with human-annotated difficulty levels, solutions with detailed explanations, and taxonomic mappings.Evaluation of state-of-the-art models reveals significant limitations, with even the best model achieving only 63.77% accuracy and particularly struggling with visual reasoning tasks.Our analysis exposes critical gaps in complex reasoning and visual-textual integration, establishing MMSciBench as a rigorous standard for measuring progress in multimodal scientific understanding.The code for MM-SciBench is open-sourced at GitHub 1 , and the dataset is available at Hugging Face 2 .

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.755
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MMSciBench: Benchmarking Language Models on Chinese Multimodal Scientific Problems

Wei Wei, Chengfan Li, Xinwu Ye, Siming Chen et al.
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

MMSciBench: Benchmarking Language Models on Chinese Multimodal Scientific Problems

Wei Wei, Chengfan Li, Xinwu Ye, Siming Chen, Robert Tang
article en

Abstract

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (LVLMs) have shown promise across many tasks, yet their scientific reasoning capabilities remain untested, particularly in multimodal settings.We present MMSciBench, a benchmark for evaluating mathematical and physical reasoning through text-only and text-image formats, with human-annotated difficulty levels, solutions with detailed explanations, and taxonomic mappings.Evaluation of state-of-the-art models reveals significant limitations, with even the best model achieving only 63.77% accuracy and particularly struggling with visual reasoning tasks.Our analysis exposes critical gaps in complex reasoning and visual-textual integration, establishing MMSciBench as a rigorous standard for measuring progress in multimodal scientific understanding.The code for MM-SciBench is open-sourced at GitHub 1 , and the dataset is available at Hugging Face 2 .

Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

MMSciBench: Benchmarking Language Models on Chinese Multimodal Scientific Problems — Wei Wei, Chengfan Li, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS