MedCite: Can Language Models Generate Verifiable Text for Medicine?

Existing LLM-based medical questionanswering systems lack citation generation and evaluation capabilities, raising concerns about their adoption in practice.In this work, we introduce MedCite, the first end-to-end framework that facilitates the design and evaluation of citation generation with LLMs for medical tasks.Meanwhile, we introduce a novel multi-pass retrieval-citation method that generates high-quality citations.Our evaluation highlights the challenges and opportunities of citation generation for medical tasks, while identifying important design choices that have a significant impact on the final citation quality.Our proposed method achieves superior citation precision and recall improvements compared to strong baseline methods, and we show that evaluation results correlate well with annotation results from professional experts.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.967
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MedCite: Can Language Models Generate Verifiable Text for Medicine?

Yu‐Wen Hu, Ming Tan, Guangzhi Xiong, Minjia Zhang et al.
Topic Modeling
article

MedCite: Can Language Models Generate Verifiable Text for Medicine?

Yu‐Wen Hu, Ming Tan, Guangzhi Xiong, Minjia Zhang, Xiao Wang, Qiao Jin, Aidong Zhang, Zhiyong Lu
article en

Abstract

Existing LLM-based medical questionanswering systems lack citation generation and evaluation capabilities, raising concerns about their adoption in practice.In this work, we introduce MedCite, the first end-to-end framework that facilitates the design and evaluation of citation generation with LLMs for medical tasks.Meanwhile, we introduce a novel multi-pass retrieval-citation method that generates high-quality citations.Our evaluation highlights the challenges and opportunities of citation generation for medical tasks, while identifying important design choices that have a significant impact on the final citation quality.Our proposed method achieves superior citation precision and recall improvements compared to strong baseline methods, and we show that evaluation results correlate well with annotation results from professional experts.

National Science Foundation, National Centre for Supercomputing Applications, National Institutes of Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, U.S. National Library of Medicine, Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure, NHLBI Division of Intramural Research
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.