Mitigating Bias in RAG: Controlling the Embedder

In retrieval augmented generation (RAG) systems, each individual component-the LLM, embedder, and corpus-could introduce biases in the form of skews towards outputting certain perspectives or identities.In this work, we study the conflict between biases of each component and their relationship to the overall bias of the RAG system, which we call bias conflict.Examining both binarized gender and political biases as case studies, we show that bias conflict can be characterized through a linear relationship among components despite its complexity in 6 different LLMs.Through comprehensive fine-tuning experiments creating 120 differently biased embedders, we demonstrate how to control bias while maintaining utility and reveal the importance of reverse-biasing the embedder to mitigate bias in the overall system.Additionally, we find that LLMs and tasks exhibit varying sensitivities to the embedder bias, a crucial factor to consider for debiasing.Our results underscore that a fair RAG system can be better achieved by carefully controlling the bias of the embedder rather than minimizing it to a neutral bias.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.974
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mitigating Bias in RAG: Controlling the Embedder

Maarten Sap, Aditi Raghunathan, Jacob M. Springer, Taeyoun Kim
2 citations
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
2.78
article

Mitigating Bias in RAG: Controlling the Embedder

Maarten Sap, Aditi Raghunathan, Jacob M. Springer, Taeyoun Kim
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In retrieval augmented generation (RAG) systems, each individual component-the LLM, embedder, and corpus-could introduce biases in the form of skews towards outputting certain perspectives or identities.In this work, we study the conflict between biases of each component and their relationship to the overall bias of the RAG system, which we call bias conflict.Examining both binarized gender and political biases as case studies, we show that bias conflict can be characterized through a linear relationship among components despite its complexity in 6 different LLMs.Through comprehensive fine-tuning experiments creating 120 differently biased embedders, we demonstrate how to control bias while maintaining utility and reveal the importance of reverse-biasing the embedder to mitigate bias in the overall system.Additionally, we find that LLMs and tasks exhibit varying sensitivities to the embedder bias, a crucial factor to consider for debiasing.Our results underscore that a fair RAG system can be better achieved by carefully controlling the bias of the embedder rather than minimizing it to a neutral bias.

National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mitigating Bias in RAG: Controlling the Embedder — Maarten Sap, Aditi Raghunathan, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS