Exploiting Instruction-Following Retrievers for Malicious Information Retrieval

Instruction-following retrievers have been widely adopted alongside LLMs in real-world applications, but little work has investigated the safety risks surrounding their increasing search capabilities.We empirically study the ability of retrievers to satisfy malicious queries, both when used directly and when used in a retrieval augmented generation-based setup.Concretely, we investigate six leading retrievers, including NV-Embed and LLM2Vec, and find that given malicious requests, most retrievers can (for >50% of queries) select relevant harmful passages.For example, LLM2Vec correctly selects passages for 61.35% of our malicious queries.We further uncover an emerging risk with instruction-following retrievers, where highly relevant harmful information can be surfaced by exploiting their instruction-following capabilities.Finally, we show that even safetyaligned LLMs, such as Llama3, can satisfy malicious requests when provided with harmful retrieved passages in-context.In summary, our findings underscore the malicious misuse risks associated with increasing retriever capability.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.673
Primary Topic
Spam and Phishing Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploiting Instruction-Following Retrievers for Malicious Information Retrieval

Nicholas Meade, Parishad BehnamGhader, Siva Reddy
Spam and Phishing Detection
article

Exploiting Instruction-Following Retrievers for Malicious Information Retrieval

Nicholas Meade, Parishad BehnamGhader, Siva Reddy
article en

Abstract

Instruction-following retrievers have been widely adopted alongside LLMs in real-world applications, but little work has investigated the safety risks surrounding their increasing search capabilities.We empirically study the ability of retrievers to satisfy malicious queries, both when used directly and when used in a retrieval augmented generation-based setup.Concretely, we investigate six leading retrievers, including NV-Embed and LLM2Vec, and find that given malicious requests, most retrievers can (for >50% of queries) select relevant harmful passages.For example, LLM2Vec correctly selects passages for 61.35% of our malicious queries.We further uncover an emerging risk with instruction-following retrievers, where highly relevant harmful information can be surfaced by exploiting their instruction-following capabilities.Finally, we show that even safetyaligned LLMs, such as Llama3, can satisfy malicious requests when provided with harmful retrieved passages in-context.In summary, our findings underscore the malicious misuse risks associated with increasing retriever capability.

Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Spam and Phishing Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploiting Instruction-Following Retrievers for Malicious Information Retrieval — Nicholas Meade, Parishad BehnamGhader, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS