Token Pruning in Multimodal Large Language Models: Are We Solving the Right Problem?

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown remarkable performance for crossmodal understanding and generation, yet still suffer from severe inference costs.Recently, abundant works have been proposed to solve this problem with token pruning, which identifies the redundant tokens in MLLMs and then prunes them to reduce the computation and KV storage costs, leading to significant acceleration without training.While these methods claim efficiency gains, critical questions about their fundamental design and evaluation remain unanswered: Why do many existing approaches underperform even compared to naive random token selection?Are attention-based scoring sufficient for reliably identifying redundant tokens?Is language information really helpful during token pruning?What makes a good trade-off between token importance and duplication?Are current evaluation protocols comprehensive and unbiased?The ignorance of previous research on these problems hinders the long-term development of token pruning.In this paper, we answer these questions one by one, providing insights into the design of future token pruning methods.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.802
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Token Pruning in Multimodal Large Language Models: Are We Solving the Right Problem?

Yifeng Gao, Conghui He, Weijia Li, Linfeng Zhang et al.
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

Token Pruning in Multimodal Large Language Models: Are We Solving the Right Problem?

Yifeng Gao, Conghui He, Weijia Li, Linfeng Zhang, Zichen Wen
article en

Abstract

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown remarkable performance for crossmodal understanding and generation, yet still suffer from severe inference costs.Recently, abundant works have been proposed to solve this problem with token pruning, which identifies the redundant tokens in MLLMs and then prunes them to reduce the computation and KV storage costs, leading to significant acceleration without training.While these methods claim efficiency gains, critical questions about their fundamental design and evaluation remain unanswered: Why do many existing approaches underperform even compared to naive random token selection?Are attention-based scoring sufficient for reliably identifying redundant tokens?Is language information really helpful during token pruning?What makes a good trade-off between token importance and duplication?Are current evaluation protocols comprehensive and unbiased?The ignorance of previous research on these problems hinders the long-term development of token pruning.In this paper, we answer these questions one by one, providing insights into the design of future token pruning methods.

Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.