GRI-QA: a Comprehensive Benchmark for Table Question Answering over Environmental Data

Assessing corporate environmental sustainability with Table Question Answering systems is challenging due to complex tables, specialized terminology, and the variety of questions they must handle.In this paper, we introduce GRI-QA, a test benchmark designed to evaluate Table QA approaches in the environmental domain.Using GRI standards, we extract and annotate tables from non-financial corporate reports, generating question-answer pairs through a hybrid LLM-human approach.The benchmark includes eight datasets, categorized by the types of operations required, including operations on multiple tables from multiple documents.Our evaluation reveals a significant gap between human and model performance, particularly in multi-step reasoning, highlighting the relevance of the benchmark and the need for further research in domain-specific Table QA.Code and benchmark

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.814
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GRI-QA: a Comprehensive Benchmark for Table Question Answering over Environmental Data

Francesco Guerra, Matteo Paganelli, Francesco Del Buono, Michele Luca Contalbo et al.
Topic Modeling
article

GRI-QA: a Comprehensive Benchmark for Table Question Answering over Environmental Data

Francesco Guerra, Matteo Paganelli, Francesco Del Buono, Michele Luca Contalbo, Sara Pederzoli, Venturelli Valeria
article en

Abstract

Assessing corporate environmental sustainability with Table Question Answering systems is challenging due to complex tables, specialized terminology, and the variety of questions they must handle.In this paper, we introduce GRI-QA, a test benchmark designed to evaluate Table QA approaches in the environmental domain.Using GRI standards, we extract and annotate tables from non-financial corporate reports, generating question-answer pairs through a hybrid LLM-human approach.The benchmark includes eight datasets, categorized by the types of operations required, including operations on multiple tables from multiple documents.Our evaluation reveals a significant gap between human and model performance, particularly in multi-step reasoning, highlighting the relevance of the benchmark and the need for further research in domain-specific Table QA.Code and benchmark

University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
Università Degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emila, European Regional Development Fund
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.