Who Can Withstand Chat-Audio Attacks? An Evaluation Benchmark for Large Audio-Language Models

Adversarial audio attacks pose a significant threat to the growing use of large audiolanguage models (LALMs) in voice-based human-machine interactions.While existing research focused on model-specific adversarial methods, real-world applications demand a more generalizable and universal approach to audio adversarial attacks.In this paper, we introduce the Chat-Audio Attacks (CAA) benchmark including four distinct types of audio attacks, which aims to explore the vulnerabilities of LALMs to these audio attacks in conversational scenarios.To evaluate the robustness of LALMs, we propose three evaluation strategies: Standard Evaluation, utilizing traditional metrics to quantify model performance under attacks; GPT-4o-Based Evaluation, which simulates real-world conversational complexities; and Human Evaluation, offering insights into user perception and trust.We evaluate six stateof-the-art LALMs with voice interaction capabilities, including Gemini-1.5-Pro,GPT-4o, and others, using three distinct evaluation methods on the CAA benchmark.Our comprehensive analysis reveals the impact of four types of audio attacks on the performance of these models, demonstrating that GPT-4o exhibits the highest level of resilience.Our data can be accessed via the following link: CAA.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.884
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Can Withstand Chat-Audio Attacks? An Evaluation Benchmark for Large Audio-Language Models

Yanda Li, Wanqi Yang, Yunchao Wei, Meng Fang et al.
1 citations
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
2.48
article

Who Can Withstand Chat-Audio Attacks? An Evaluation Benchmark for Large Audio-Language Models

Yanda Li, Wanqi Yang, Yunchao Wei, Meng Fang, Chen Ling
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Adversarial audio attacks pose a significant threat to the growing use of large audiolanguage models (LALMs) in voice-based human-machine interactions.While existing research focused on model-specific adversarial methods, real-world applications demand a more generalizable and universal approach to audio adversarial attacks.In this paper, we introduce the Chat-Audio Attacks (CAA) benchmark including four distinct types of audio attacks, which aims to explore the vulnerabilities of LALMs to these audio attacks in conversational scenarios.To evaluate the robustness of LALMs, we propose three evaluation strategies: Standard Evaluation, utilizing traditional metrics to quantify model performance under attacks; GPT-4o-Based Evaluation, which simulates real-world conversational complexities; and Human Evaluation, offering insights into user perception and trust.We evaluate six stateof-the-art LALMs with voice interaction capabilities, including Gemini-1.5-Pro,GPT-4o, and others, using three distinct evaluation methods on the CAA benchmark.Our comprehensive analysis reveals the impact of four types of audio attacks on the performance of these models, demonstrating that GPT-4o exhibits the highest level of resilience.Our data can be accessed via the following link: CAA.

Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who Can Withstand Chat-Audio Attacks? An Evaluation Benchmark for Large Audio-Language Models — Yanda Li, Wanqi Yang, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS