ASTRID - An Automated and Scalable TRIaD for the Evaluation of RAG-based Clinical Question Answering Systems

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive potential in clinical question answering (QA), with Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) emerging as a leading approach for ensuring the factual accuracy of model responses.However, current automated RAG metrics perform poorly in clinical and conversational use cases.Using clinical human evaluations of responses is expensive, unscalable, and not conducive to the continuous iterative development of RAG systems.To address these challenges, we introduce ASTRID -an Automated and Scalable TRIaD for evaluating clinical QA systems leveraging RAG -consisting of three metrics: Context Relevance (CR), Refusal Accuracy (RA), and Conversational Faithfulness (CF).Our novel evaluation metric, CF, is designed to better capture the faithfulness of a model's response to the knowledge base without penalizing conversational elements.Additionally, our metric RA captures the refusal to address questions outside of the system's scope of practice.To validate our triad, we curate a dataset of over 200 real-world patient questions posed to an LLM-based QA agent during surgical follow-up for cataract surgery -the highest volume operation in the worldaugmented with clinician-selected questions for emergency, and clinical and non-clinical out-of-domain scenarios.We demonstrate that CF predicts human ratings of faithfulness more accurately than existing definitions in conversational settings.Furthermore, using eight different LLMs, we demonstrate that the three metrics can closely agree with human evaluations, highlighting the potential of these metrics for use in LLM-driven automated evaluation pipelines.Finally, we show that evaluation using our triad of CF, RA, and CR exhibits alignment with clinician assessment for inappropriate, harmful, or unhelpful responses.We also publish the prompts and datasets for these experiments, providing valuable resources for further research and development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.857
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ASTRID - An Automated and Scalable TRIaD for the Evaluation of RAG-based Clinical Question Answering Systems

Ernest Lim, Mohita Chowdhury, Aisling Higham, Yajie Vera He et al.
Topic Modeling
article

ASTRID - An Automated and Scalable TRIaD for the Evaluation of RAG-based Clinical Question Answering Systems

Ernest Lim, Mohita Chowdhury, Aisling Higham, Yajie Vera He, Jared Joselowitz
article en

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive potential in clinical question answering (QA), with Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) emerging as a leading approach for ensuring the factual accuracy of model responses.However, current automated RAG metrics perform poorly in clinical and conversational use cases.Using clinical human evaluations of responses is expensive, unscalable, and not conducive to the continuous iterative development of RAG systems.To address these challenges, we introduce ASTRID -an Automated and Scalable TRIaD for evaluating clinical QA systems leveraging RAG -consisting of three metrics: Context Relevance (CR), Refusal Accuracy (RA), and Conversational Faithfulness (CF).Our novel evaluation metric, CF, is designed to better capture the faithfulness of a model's response to the knowledge base without penalizing conversational elements.Additionally, our metric RA captures the refusal to address questions outside of the system's scope of practice.To validate our triad, we curate a dataset of over 200 real-world patient questions posed to an LLM-based QA agent during surgical follow-up for cataract surgery -the highest volume operation in the worldaugmented with clinician-selected questions for emergency, and clinical and non-clinical out-of-domain scenarios.We demonstrate that CF predicts human ratings of faithfulness more accurately than existing definitions in conversational settings.Furthermore, using eight different LLMs, we demonstrate that the three metrics can closely agree with human evaluations, highlighting the potential of these metrics for use in LLM-driven automated evaluation pipelines.Finally, we show that evaluation using our triad of CF, RA, and CR exhibits alignment with clinician assessment for inappropriate, harmful, or unhelpful responses.We also publish the prompts and datasets for these experiments, providing valuable resources for further research and development.

Ionian University (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.