The Anatomy of Evidence: An Investigation Into Explainable ICD Coding

Automatic medical coding has the potential to ease documentation and billing processes.For this task, transparency plays an important role for medical coders and regulatory bodies, which can be achieved using explainability methods.However, the evaluation of these approaches has been mostly limited to short text and binary settings due to a scarcity of annotated data.Recent efforts by Cheng et al. ( 2023) have introduced the MDACE dataset, which provides a valuable resource containing code evidence in clinical records.In this work, we conduct an in-depth analysis of the MDACE dataset and perform plausibility evaluation of current explainable medical coding systems from an applied perspective.With this, we contribute to a deeper understanding of automatic medical coding and evidence extraction.Our findings reveal that ground truth evidence aligns with code descriptions to a certain degree.An investigation into state-of-the-art approaches shows a high overlap with ground truth evidence.We propose match measures and highlight success and failure cases.Based on our findings, we provide recommendations for developing and evaluating explainable medical coding systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.864
Primary Topic
Library Science and Information Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Anatomy of Evidence: An Investigation Into Explainable ICD Coding

Stefan Rueping, Katharina Beckh, Dario Antweiler, Elisa Studeny et al.
Library Science and Information Systems
article

The Anatomy of Evidence: An Investigation Into Explainable ICD Coding

Stefan Rueping, Katharina Beckh, Dario Antweiler, Elisa Studeny, Sujan Sai Gannamaneni
article en

Abstract

Automatic medical coding has the potential to ease documentation and billing processes.For this task, transparency plays an important role for medical coders and regulatory bodies, which can be achieved using explainability methods.However, the evaluation of these approaches has been mostly limited to short text and binary settings due to a scarcity of annotated data.Recent efforts by Cheng et al. ( 2023) have introduced the MDACE dataset, which provides a valuable resource containing code evidence in clinical records.In this work, we conduct an in-depth analysis of the MDACE dataset and perform plausibility evaluation of current explainable medical coding systems from an applied perspective.With this, we contribute to a deeper understanding of automatic medical coding and evidence extraction.Our findings reveal that ground truth evidence aligns with code descriptions to a certain degree.An investigation into state-of-the-art approaches shows a high overlap with ground truth evidence.We propose match measures and highlight success and failure cases.Based on our findings, we provide recommendations for developing and evaluating explainable medical coding systems.

Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Library Science and Information Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Anatomy of Evidence: An Investigation Into Explainable ICD Coding — Stefan Rueping, Katharina Beckh, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS