Robustness and Confounders in the Demographic Alignment of LLMs with Human Perceptions of Offensiveness

Despite a growing literature finding that large language models (LLMs) exhibit demographic biases, reports with whom they align best are hard to generalize or even contradictory.In this work, we examine the alignment of LLMs with human annotations in five offensive language datasets, comprising approximately 220K annotations.While demographic traits, particularly race, influence alignment, these effects vary across datasets and are often entangled with other factors.Confounders introduced in the annotation process-such as document difficulty, annotator sensitivity, and withingroup agreement-account for more variation in alignment patterns than demographic traits.Alignment increases with annotator sensitivity and group agreement, and decreases with document difficulty.Our results underscore the importance of multi-dataset analyses and confounder-aware methodologies in developing robust measures of demographic bias.