AfroBench: How Good are Large Language Models on African Languages?

Large-scale multilingual evaluations, such as MEGA, often include only a handful of African languages due to the scarcity of high-quality evaluation data and the limited discoverability of existing African datasets.This lack of representation hinders comprehensive LLM evaluation across a diverse range of languages and tasks.To address these challenges, we introduce AFROBENCH-a multi-task benchmark for evaluating the performance of LLMs across 64 African languages, 15 tasks and 22 datasets.AFROBENCH consists of nine natural language understanding datasets, six text generation datasets, six knowledge and question answering tasks, and one mathematical reasoning task.We present results comparing the performance of prompting LLMs to fine-tuned baselines based on BERT and T5-style models.Our results suggest large gaps in performance between high-resource languages, such as English, and African languages across most tasks; but performance also varies based on the availability of monolingual data resources.Our findings confirm that performance on African languages continues to remain a hurdle for current LLMs, underscoring the need for additional efforts to close this gap.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.976
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Language and cultural evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
65.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AfroBench: How Good are Large Language Models on African Languages?

Odunayo Ogundepo, Jessica Ojo, Pontus Stenetorp, Akintunde Oladipo et al.
4 citations
Language and cultural evolution
65.96
article

AfroBench: How Good are Large Language Models on African Languages?

Odunayo Ogundepo, Jessica Ojo, Pontus Stenetorp, Akintunde Oladipo, Jimmy Lin, Kelechi Ogueji, David Ifeoluwa Adelani
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Large-scale multilingual evaluations, such as MEGA, often include only a handful of African languages due to the scarcity of high-quality evaluation data and the limited discoverability of existing African datasets.This lack of representation hinders comprehensive LLM evaluation across a diverse range of languages and tasks.To address these challenges, we introduce AFROBENCH-a multi-task benchmark for evaluating the performance of LLMs across 64 African languages, 15 tasks and 22 datasets.AFROBENCH consists of nine natural language understanding datasets, six text generation datasets, six knowledge and question answering tasks, and one mathematical reasoning task.We present results comparing the performance of prompting LLMs to fine-tuned baselines based on BERT and T5-style models.Our results suggest large gaps in performance between high-resource languages, such as English, and African languages across most tasks; but performance also varies based on the availability of monolingual data resources.Our findings confirm that performance on African languages continues to remain a hurdle for current LLMs, underscoring the need for additional efforts to close this gap.

Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Language and cultural evolution
65.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.