Diagnosing Failures in Large Language Models’ Answers: Integrating Error Attribution into Evaluation Framework

With the widespread application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in various tasks, the mainstream LLM platforms generate massive user-model interactions daily.In order to efficiently analyze the performance of models and diagnose failures in their answers, it is essential to develop an automated framework to systematically categorize and attribute errors.However, existing evaluation models lack error attribution capability.In this work, we establish a comprehensive Misattribution Framework with 6 primary and 15 secondary categories to facilitate in-depth analysis.Based on this framework, we present AttriData, a dataset specifically designed for error attribution, encompassing misattribution, along with the corresponding scores and feedback.We also propose MisAttributionLLM, a fine-tuned model on AttriData, which is the first general-purpose judge model capable of simultaneously generating score, misattribution, and feedback.Extensive experiments and analyses are conducted to confirm the effectiveness and robustness of our proposed method.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.1089
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnosing Failures in Large Language Models’ Answers: Integrating Error Attribution into Evaluation Framework

Fan Lin, Qingsong Lv, Linlin Song, Shuyi Xie et al.
Topic Modeling
article

Diagnosing Failures in Large Language Models’ Answers: Integrating Error Attribution into Evaluation Framework

Fan Lin, Qingsong Lv, Linlin Song, Shuyi Xie, Zishan Xu, Shupei Xiao, Sui Wenjuan
article en

Abstract

With the widespread application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in various tasks, the mainstream LLM platforms generate massive user-model interactions daily.In order to efficiently analyze the performance of models and diagnose failures in their answers, it is essential to develop an automated framework to systematically categorize and attribute errors.However, existing evaluation models lack error attribution capability.In this work, we establish a comprehensive Misattribution Framework with 6 primary and 15 secondary categories to facilitate in-depth analysis.Based on this framework, we present AttriData, a dataset specifically designed for error attribution, encompassing misattribution, along with the corresponding scores and feedback.We also propose MisAttributionLLM, a fine-tuned model on AttriData, which is the first general-purpose judge model capable of simultaneously generating score, misattribution, and feedback.Extensive experiments and analyses are conducted to confirm the effectiveness and robustness of our proposed method.

Tencent, Tsinghua University
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Diagnosing Failures in Large Language Models’ Answers: Integrating Error Attribution into Evaluation Framework — Fan Lin, Qingsong Lv, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS