LEXICO-SEMANTIC PROCESSES IN SECTORAL TERMINOLOGICAL SYSTEMS (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE TERMINOLOGICAL SYSTEM "FORESTRY")

Aim. To conduct a lexical-semantic analysis of forestry terms in Russian and English and describe the lexical-semantic processes inherent in this terminology system. Methodology . The main content of the study is an analysis of such lexical-semantic processes inherent in the terms “forestry” as synonymy, polysemy, and homonymy. In our research, we used a multifaceted methodology (comparative analysis of Russian and English terms, cognitive analysis). The material for the article was the forestry terminology system identified by the method of continuous sampling from English-Russian and Russian-English forestry dictionaries. Results. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that the forestry terminology system is fully characterized by lexical-semantic processes of synonymy, polysemy, and homonymy, which may be caused by foreign language borrowings, among other things, while cognitive research helps to identify the characteristics of the scientific worldview. Research implications. The existing knowledge in terminology about the phenomena of synonymy, polysemy, and homonymy in languages for special purposes has been expanded. The collected material can be used in courses on linguistics, terminology, and translation theory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2025-2-1569
Primary Topic
linguistics and terminology studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LEXICO-SEMANTIC PROCESSES IN SECTORAL TERMINOLOGICAL SYSTEMS (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE TERMINOLOGICAL SYSTEM "FORESTRY")

Marina A. Karpukhina, Tamara K. Uliskina, Yuliya V. Popandopulo
Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University
linguistics and terminology studies
article

LEXICO-SEMANTIC PROCESSES IN SECTORAL TERMINOLOGICAL SYSTEMS (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE TERMINOLOGICAL SYSTEM "FORESTRY")

Marina A. Karpukhina, Tamara K. Uliskina, Yuliya V. Popandopulo
article en

Abstract

Aim. To conduct a lexical-semantic analysis of forestry terms in Russian and English and describe the lexical-semantic processes inherent in this terminology system. Methodology . The main content of the study is an analysis of such lexical-semantic processes inherent in the terms “forestry” as synonymy, polysemy, and homonymy. In our research, we used a multifaceted methodology (comparative analysis of Russian and English terms, cognitive analysis). The material for the article was the forestry terminology system identified by the method of continuous sampling from English-Russian and Russian-English forestry dictionaries. Results. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that the forestry terminology system is fully characterized by lexical-semantic processes of synonymy, polysemy, and homonymy, which may be caused by foreign language borrowings, among other things, while cognitive research helps to identify the characteristics of the scientific worldview. Research implications. The existing knowledge in terminology about the phenomena of synonymy, polysemy, and homonymy in languages for special purposes has been expanded. The collected material can be used in courses on linguistics, terminology, and translation theory.

Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University(2)
Bauman Moscow State Technical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
linguistics and terminology studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.