How Personality Traits Shape LLM Risk-Taking Behaviour

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents for simulation and decision-making, necessitating a deeper understanding of their decisionmaking behaviour under risk.We investigate the relationship between LLMs' personality traits and risk-propensity, applying Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT) and the Big Five personality framework.We compare the behaviour of several LLMs to human baselines.Our findings show that the majority of the models investigated are risk-neutral rational agents, whilst displaying higher Conscientiousness and Agreeableness traits, coupled with lower Neuroticism.Interventions on Big Five traits, particularly Openness, influence the risk-propensity of several LLMs.Advanced models mirror human personalityrisk patterns, suggesting that cognitive biases can be surfaced by optimal prompting.However, their distilled variants show no cognitive bias, suggesting limitations to knowledge transfer processes.Notably, Openness emerges as the most influential factor to riskpropensity, aligning with human baselines.In contrast, less advanced models demonstrate inconsistent generalization of the personalityrisk relationship.This research advances our understanding of LLM behaviour under risk and highlights the potential and limitations of personality-based interventions in shaping LLM decision-making.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.1085
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Personality Traits Shape LLM Risk-Taking Behaviour

James Hartley, Ramin Okhrati, Raad Khraishi, Devesh Batra et al.
1 citations
Artificial Intelligence in Law
8.52
article

How Personality Traits Shape LLM Risk-Taking Behaviour

James Hartley, Ramin Okhrati, Raad Khraishi, Devesh Batra, Conor Hamill, Dale Seddon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents for simulation and decision-making, necessitating a deeper understanding of their decisionmaking behaviour under risk.We investigate the relationship between LLMs' personality traits and risk-propensity, applying Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT) and the Big Five personality framework.We compare the behaviour of several LLMs to human baselines.Our findings show that the majority of the models investigated are risk-neutral rational agents, whilst displaying higher Conscientiousness and Agreeableness traits, coupled with lower Neuroticism.Interventions on Big Five traits, particularly Openness, influence the risk-propensity of several LLMs.Advanced models mirror human personalityrisk patterns, suggesting that cognitive biases can be surfaced by optimal prompting.However, their distilled variants show no cognitive bias, suggesting limitations to knowledge transfer processes.Notably, Openness emerges as the most influential factor to riskpropensity, aligning with human baselines.In contrast, less advanced models demonstrate inconsistent generalization of the personalityrisk relationship.This research advances our understanding of LLM behaviour under risk and highlights the potential and limitations of personality-based interventions in shaping LLM decision-making.

Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.