ExpliCa: Evaluating Explicit Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in tasks requiring interpretive and inferential accuracy.In this paper, we introduce ExpliCa, a new dataset for evaluating LLMs in explicit causal reasoning.ExpliCa uniquely integrates both causal and temporal relations presented in different linguistic orders and explicitly expressed by linguistic connectives.The dataset is enriched with crowdsourced human acceptability ratings.We tested LLMs on Ex-pliCa through prompting and perplexity-based metrics.We assessed seven commercial and open-source LLMs, revealing that even top models struggle to reach 0.80 accuracy.Interestingly, models tend to confound temporal relations with causal ones, and their performance is also strongly influenced by the linguistic order of the events.Finally, perplexitybased scores and prompting performance are differently affected by model size.Model Overall C. Ic. T. Ic. C. a.Ic.T. a.Ic.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.891
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ExpliCa: Evaluating Explicit Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models

Irene Sucameli, Lucia Passaro, Alessandro Lenci, Emmanuele Chersoni et al.
2 citations
Topic Modeling
4.96
article

ExpliCa: Evaluating Explicit Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models

Irene Sucameli, Lucia Passaro, Alessandro Lenci, Emmanuele Chersoni, Martina Miliani, Alessandro Bondielli, Serena Auriemma
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in tasks requiring interpretive and inferential accuracy.In this paper, we introduce ExpliCa, a new dataset for evaluating LLMs in explicit causal reasoning.ExpliCa uniquely integrates both causal and temporal relations presented in different linguistic orders and explicitly expressed by linguistic connectives.The dataset is enriched with crowdsourced human acceptability ratings.We tested LLMs on Ex-pliCa through prompting and perplexity-based metrics.We assessed seven commercial and open-source LLMs, revealing that even top models struggle to reach 0.80 accuracy.Interestingly, models tend to confound temporal relations with causal ones, and their performance is also strongly influenced by the linguistic order of the events.Finally, perplexitybased scores and prompting performance are differently affected by model size.Model Overall C. Ic. T. Ic. C. a.Ic.T. a.Ic.

European Commission, Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Topic Modeling
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ExpliCa: Evaluating Explicit Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models — Irene Sucameli, Lucia Passaro, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS