Explain then Rank: Scale Calibration of Neural Rankers Using Natural Language Explanations from LLMs

In search settings, calibrating the scores during the ranking process to quantities such as click-through rates or relevance levels enhances a system's usefulness and trustworthiness for downstream users.While previous research has improved this notion of calibration for low complexity learning-to-rank models, the larger data demands and parameter count specific to modern neural text rankers produce unique obstacles that hamper the efficacy of methods intended for the learning-to-rank setting.This paper proposes exploiting large language models (LLMs) to provide relevance and uncertainty signals for these neural text rankers to produce scale-calibrated scores through Monte Carlo sampling of natural language explanations (NLEs).Our approach transforms the neural ranking task from ranking textual querydocument pairs to ranking corresponding synthesized NLEs.Comprehensive experiments on two popular document ranking datasets show that the NLE-based calibration approach consistently outperforms past calibration methods and LLM-based methods for ranking, calibration, and query performance prediction tasks.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.1167
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explain then Rank: Scale Calibration of Neural Rankers Using Natural Language Explanations from LLMs

Hemank Lamba, Joel Tetreault, Alejandro Jaimes, Daniel J. Cohen et al.
1 citations
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2.48
article

Explain then Rank: Scale Calibration of Neural Rankers Using Natural Language Explanations from LLMs

Hemank Lamba, Joel Tetreault, Alejandro Jaimes, Daniel J. Cohen, Puxuan Yu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In search settings, calibrating the scores during the ranking process to quantities such as click-through rates or relevance levels enhances a system's usefulness and trustworthiness for downstream users.While previous research has improved this notion of calibration for low complexity learning-to-rank models, the larger data demands and parameter count specific to modern neural text rankers produce unique obstacles that hamper the efficacy of methods intended for the learning-to-rank setting.This paper proposes exploiting large language models (LLMs) to provide relevance and uncertainty signals for these neural text rankers to produce scale-calibrated scores through Monte Carlo sampling of natural language explanations (NLEs).Our approach transforms the neural ranking task from ranking textual querydocument pairs to ranking corresponding synthesized NLEs.Comprehensive experiments on two popular document ranking datasets show that the NLE-based calibration approach consistently outperforms past calibration methods and LLM-based methods for ranking, calibration, and query performance prediction tasks.

Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Explain then Rank: Scale Calibration of Neural Rankers Using Natural Language Explanations from LLMs — Hemank Lamba, Joel Tetreault, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS