AL-QASIDA: Analyzing LLM Quality and Accuracy Systematically in Dialectal Arabic

Dialectal Arabic (DA) varieties are underserved by language technologies, particularly large language models (LLMs).This trend threatens to exacerbate existing social inequalities and limits LLM applications, yet the research community lacks operationalized performance measurements in DA.We present a framework that comprehensively assesses LLMs' DA modeling capabilities across four dimensions: fidelity, understanding, quality, and diglossia.We evaluate nine LLMs in eight DA varieties and provide practical recommendations.Our evaluation suggests that LLMs do not produce DA as well as they understand it, not because their DA fluency is poor, but because they are reluctant to generate DA.Further analysis suggests that current post-training can contribute to bias against DA, that few-shot examples can overcome this deficiency, and that otherwise no measurable features of input text correlate well with LLM DA performance.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.1137
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AL-QASIDA: Analyzing LLM Quality and Accuracy Systematically in Dialectal Arabic

Salah-Eldin Abdelmoneim, Sebastian Ruder, Nathaniel Romney Robinson, Kelly Marchisio
2 citations
Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
20.85
article

AL-QASIDA: Analyzing LLM Quality and Accuracy Systematically in Dialectal Arabic

Salah-Eldin Abdelmoneim, Sebastian Ruder, Nathaniel Romney Robinson, Kelly Marchisio
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Dialectal Arabic (DA) varieties are underserved by language technologies, particularly large language models (LLMs).This trend threatens to exacerbate existing social inequalities and limits LLM applications, yet the research community lacks operationalized performance measurements in DA.We present a framework that comprehensively assesses LLMs' DA modeling capabilities across four dimensions: fidelity, understanding, quality, and diglossia.We evaluate nine LLMs in eight DA varieties and provide practical recommendations.Our evaluation suggests that LLMs do not produce DA as well as they understand it, not because their DA fluency is poor, but because they are reluctant to generate DA.Further analysis suggests that current post-training can contribute to bias against DA, that few-shot examples can overcome this deficiency, and that otherwise no measurable features of input text correlate well with LLM DA performance.

Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
20.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.