EARLY VERSUS DELAYED INTERVENTIONAL EMBOLIZATION FOR RUPTURED ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY ANEURYSMS: A SINGLE-CENTER RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY OF 22 CASES WITH LITERATURE REVIEW

Objective: To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of early interventional embolization in the treatment of ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Given the current controversy regarding the timing of interventional embolization, this study aims to provide a basis for optimizing treatment strategies. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 22 patients with ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms admitted to the interventional center of a hospital from January 2024 to February 2024. Patients were divided into the experimental group (interventional embolization within 72 hours of onset, n=11) and the control group (interventional embolization after 72 hours of onset, n=11) based on the timing of treatment. Data were collected on surgical success rate, complications, and neurological prognosis. Statistical analysis was performed using χ2 test and t-test. Results: The surgical success rate in the experimental group (100%) was significantly higher than in the control group (81.8%, P < 0.05). The incidence of severe complications such as severe pneumonia and hydrocephalus in the experimental group (9.1%) was significantly lower than in the control group (36.4%, P < 0.05). The mRS score at 6-month follow-up in the experimental group (1.42 ± 0.9) was better than that in the control group (2.15 ± 1.8, P < 0.05); the proportion of patients with mRS score ≤ 2 at 6-month follow-up in the experimental group (90.9%) was higher than that in the control group (72.7%, P < 0.05). These findings are consistent with previous studies that have shown early interventional embolization can significantly improve the surgical success rate, reduce the risk of complications, and improve the neurological prognosis of patients with ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms.Conclusion: Early interventional embolization in the treatment of ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms can significantly improve the surgical success rate, reduce the risk of complications, and improve the neurological prognosis. This study provides important evidence for optimizing treatment strategies.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61784/jpmr3039
Primary Topic
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EARLY VERSUS DELAYED INTERVENTIONAL EMBOLIZATION FOR RUPTURED ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY ANEURYSMS: A SINGLE-CENTER RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY OF 22 CASES WITH LITERATURE REVIEW

1 links
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
article

EARLY VERSUS DELAYED INTERVENTIONAL EMBOLIZATION FOR RUPTURED ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY ANEURYSMS: A SINGLE-CENTER RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY OF 22 CASES WITH LITERATURE REVIEW

article en

Abstract

Objective: To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of early interventional embolization in the treatment of ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Given the current controversy regarding the timing of interventional embolization, this study aims to provide a basis for optimizing treatment strategies. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 22 patients with ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms admitted to the interventional center of a hospital from January 2024 to February 2024. Patients were divided into the experimental group (interventional embolization within 72 hours of onset, n=11) and the control group (interventional embolization after 72 hours of onset, n=11) based on the timing of treatment. Data were collected on surgical success rate, complications, and neurological prognosis. Statistical analysis was performed using χ2 test and t-test. Results: The surgical success rate in the experimental group (100%) was significantly higher than in the control group (81.8%, P < 0.05). The incidence of severe complications such as severe pneumonia and hydrocephalus in the experimental group (9.1%) was significantly lower than in the control group (36.4%, P < 0.05). The mRS score at 6-month follow-up in the experimental group (1.42 ± 0.9) was better than that in the control group (2.15 ± 1.8, P < 0.05); the proportion of patients with mRS score ≤ 2 at 6-month follow-up in the experimental group (90.9%) was higher than that in the control group (72.7%, P < 0.05). These findings are consistent with previous studies that have shown early interventional embolization can significantly improve the surgical success rate, reduce the risk of complications, and improve the neurological prognosis of patients with ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms.Conclusion: Early interventional embolization in the treatment of ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms can significantly improve the surgical success rate, reduce the risk of complications, and improve the neurological prognosis. This study provides important evidence for optimizing treatment strategies.

Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical ResearchVol. 7(2)
The Second Nanning People's Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

EARLY VERSUS DELAYED INTERVENTIONAL EMBOLIZATION FOR RUPTURED ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY ANEURYSMS: A SINGLE-CENTER RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY OF 22 CASES WITH LITERATURE REVIEW · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS