DISPUTool 3.0: Fallacy Detection and Repairing in Argumentative Political Debates

This paper introduces and evaluates a novel web-based application designed to identify and repair fallacious arguments in political debates.DISPUTool 3.0 offers a comprehensive tool for argumentation analysis of political debate, integrating state-of-the-art natural language processing techniques to mine and classify argument components and relations.DISPUTool 3.0 builds on the ElecDeb60to20 dataset, covering US presidential debates from 1960 to 2020.In this paper, we introduce a novel task which is integrated as a new module in DISPUTool, i.e., the automatic detection and classification of fallacious arguments, and the automatic repairing of such misleading arguments.The goal is to show to the user a tool which not only identifies fallacies in political debates, but it also shows how the argument looks like once the veil of fallacy falls down.An extensive evaluation of the module is addressed employing both automated metrics and human assessments.With the inclusion of this module, DISPUTool 3.0 advances even more user critical thinking in front of the augmenting spread of such nefarious kind of content in political debates and beyond.The tool is publicly available here: https: //3ia-demos.inria.fr/disputool/

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-demo.45
Primary Topic
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DISPUTool 3.0: Fallacy Detection and Repairing in Argumentative Political Debates

Serena Villata, Pierpaolo Goffredo, Elena Cabrio, Deborah Dore
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
article

DISPUTool 3.0: Fallacy Detection and Repairing in Argumentative Political Debates

Serena Villata, Pierpaolo Goffredo, Elena Cabrio, Deborah Dore
article en

Abstract

This paper introduces and evaluates a novel web-based application designed to identify and repair fallacious arguments in political debates.DISPUTool 3.0 offers a comprehensive tool for argumentation analysis of political debate, integrating state-of-the-art natural language processing techniques to mine and classify argument components and relations.DISPUTool 3.0 builds on the ElecDeb60to20 dataset, covering US presidential debates from 1960 to 2020.In this paper, we introduce a novel task which is integrated as a new module in DISPUTool, i.e., the automatic detection and classification of fallacious arguments, and the automatic repairing of such misleading arguments.The goal is to show to the user a tool which not only identifies fallacies in political debates, but it also shows how the argument looks like once the veil of fallacy falls down.An extensive evaluation of the module is addressed employing both automated metrics and human assessments.With the inclusion of this module, DISPUTool 3.0 advances even more user critical thinking in front of the augmenting spread of such nefarious kind of content in political debates and beyond.The tool is publicly available here: https: //3ia-demos.inria.fr/disputool/

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR), Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy (US)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

DISPUTool 3.0: Fallacy Detection and Repairing in Argumentative Political Debates — Serena Villata, Pierpaolo Goffredo, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS