Teaching Vision-Language Models to Ask: Resolving Ambiguity in Visual Questions

In visual question answering (VQA) context, users often pose ambiguous questions to visual language models (VLMs) due to varying expression habits.Existing research addresses such ambiguities primarily by rephrasing questions.These approaches neglect the inherently interactive nature of user interactions with VLMs, where ambiguities can be clarified through user feedback.However, research on interactive clarification faces two major challenges: (1) Benchmarks are absent to assess VLMs' capacity for resolving ambiguities through interaction; (2) VLMs are trained to prefer answering rather than asking, preventing them from seeking clarification.To overcome these challenges, we introduce ClearVQA benchmark 1 , which targets three common categories of ambiguity in VQA context, and encompasses various VQA scenarios.Furthermore, we propose an automated pipeline to generate ambiguity-clarification question pairs.Experimental results demonstrate that training based on the automated generated data enables VLMs to ask reasonable clarification questions, thereby generating more accurate and specific answers based on user feedback.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.182
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching Vision-Language Models to Ask: Resolving Ambiguity in Visual Questions

Shuo Ren, Wen Yang, Jiajun Zhang, Jian Pu et al.
1 citations
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
3.25
article

Teaching Vision-Language Models to Ask: Resolving Ambiguity in Visual Questions

Shuo Ren, Wen Yang, Jiajun Zhang, Jian Pu, Donglei Yu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In visual question answering (VQA) context, users often pose ambiguous questions to visual language models (VLMs) due to varying expression habits.Existing research addresses such ambiguities primarily by rephrasing questions.These approaches neglect the inherently interactive nature of user interactions with VLMs, where ambiguities can be clarified through user feedback.However, research on interactive clarification faces two major challenges: (1) Benchmarks are absent to assess VLMs' capacity for resolving ambiguities through interaction; (2) VLMs are trained to prefer answering rather than asking, preventing them from seeking clarification.To overcome these challenges, we introduce ClearVQA benchmark 1 , which targets three common categories of ambiguity in VQA context, and encompasses various VQA scenarios.Furthermore, we propose an automated pipeline to generate ambiguity-clarification question pairs.Experimental results demonstrate that training based on the automated generated data enables VLMs to ask reasonable clarification questions, thereby generating more accurate and specific answers based on user feedback.

Chinese Academy of Sciences
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Teaching Vision-Language Models to Ask: Resolving Ambiguity in Visual Questions — Shuo Ren, Wen Yang, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS