Influences on LLM Calibration: A Study of Response Agreement, Loss Functions, and Prompt Styles

Calibration, the alignment between model confidence and prediction accuracy, is critical for the reliable deployment of large language models (LLMs).Existing works neglect to measure the generalization of their methods to other prompt styles and different sizes of LLMs.To address this, we define a controlled experimental setting covering 12 LLMs and four prompt styles.We additionally investigate if incorporating the response agreement of multiple LLMs and an appropriate loss function can improve calibration performance.Concretely, we build Calib-n, a novel framework that trains an auxiliary model for confidence estimation that aggregates responses from multiple LLMs to capture inter-model agreement.To optimize calibration, we integrate focal and AUC surrogate losses alongside binary cross-entropy.Experiments across four datasets demonstrate that both response agreement and focal loss improve calibration from baselines.We find that few-shot prompts are the most effective for auxiliary model-based methods, and auxiliary models demonstrate robust calibration performance across accuracy variations, outperforming LLMs' internal probabilities and verbalized confidences. 1 Sigmoid ...

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.188
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influences on LLM Calibration: A Study of Response Agreement, Loss Functions, and Prompt Styles

Ye Xia, Benjamin Roth, Pedro Araujo, Klim Zaporojets
4 citations
Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
19.97
article

Influences on LLM Calibration: A Study of Response Agreement, Loss Functions, and Prompt Styles

Ye Xia, Benjamin Roth, Pedro Araujo, Klim Zaporojets
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Calibration, the alignment between model confidence and prediction accuracy, is critical for the reliable deployment of large language models (LLMs).Existing works neglect to measure the generalization of their methods to other prompt styles and different sizes of LLMs.To address this, we define a controlled experimental setting covering 12 LLMs and four prompt styles.We additionally investigate if incorporating the response agreement of multiple LLMs and an appropriate loss function can improve calibration performance.Concretely, we build Calib-n, a novel framework that trains an auxiliary model for confidence estimation that aggregates responses from multiple LLMs to capture inter-model agreement.To optimize calibration, we integrate focal and AUC surrogate losses alongside binary cross-entropy.Experiments across four datasets demonstrate that both response agreement and focal loss improve calibration from baselines.We find that few-shot prompts are the most effective for auxiliary model-based methods, and auxiliary models demonstrate robust calibration performance across accuracy variations, outperforming LLMs' internal probabilities and verbalized confidences. 1 Sigmoid ...

European Commission, Vienna Science and Technology Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
19.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Influences on LLM Calibration: A Study of Response Agreement, Loss Functions, and Prompt Styles — Ye Xia, Benjamin Roth, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS