Security Assessment for Guest-to-Guest and Host-to-Guest Isolation in Type 1 and Type 2 Open-Source Hypervisors: A Focus on Attack Vectors

The global IT management landscape has shifted from physical to virtual computing. The transition process that makes virtualized execution environments possible is controlled by the underlying software apparatus known as a hypervisor. Based on the design architecture and configuration, hypervisors differ in the degree of virtual machine isolation, making security a serious concern for technology adopters. This paper presents the security assessment of open-source hypervisors using attack vectors for guest-to-guest (G2G) and host-to-guest (H2G) penetrations. The study uses Proxmox VE and XenServer for Type 1 hypervisors and Kernel Virtual Machine (KVM) and Oracle Virtual Box (OVB) for Type 2, with secondary data analysis based on software vulnerabilities and exposures retrieved from publicly available online databases. For clarity, the source codes of each hypervisor were scanned to identify vulnerable files in an experiment conducted on a Kali Linux testbed with prebuilt virtual machines, each hosting one hypervisor. The vulnerability level was determined using 11 attack vectors extracted qualitatively from relevant literature. The soft memory management unit was found to be the most common attack vector among all hypervisors. Type 1 hypervisors are far better at responding to virtual resource attacks, whereas type 2 hypervisors are more vulnerable to attacks that suffocate computational resources, especially virtual CPUs. OVB outperforms other hypervisors in terms of disk and network performance as it is more resistant to attacks involving I/O networking, interrupt and timer mechanisms, and hypercalls. The results also show that all hypervisors perform better against G2G than H2G attacks. For H2G attacks, the Proxmox VE and KVM have demonstrated better performance compared to other hypervisors. According to analysis, the most prevalent hypervisor flaws are mainly due to design faults rather than misconfigurations by adopters. To get rid of hypervisor weaknesses and fully capitalize on the technological shift from physical to virtual computing, adopters should consider industry-accepted best practices when selecting, installing, and deploying open-source hypervisors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Huria Journal of the Open University of Tanzania
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61538/huria.v30i2.1680
Primary Topic
Security and Verification in Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Security Assessment for Guest-to-Guest and Host-to-Guest Isolation in Type 1 and Type 2 Open-Source Hypervisors: A Focus on Attack Vectors

Said Ally
Huria Journal of the Open University of Tanzania
Security and Verification in Computing
article

Security Assessment for Guest-to-Guest and Host-to-Guest Isolation in Type 1 and Type 2 Open-Source Hypervisors: A Focus on Attack Vectors

Said Ally
article en

Abstract

The global IT management landscape has shifted from physical to virtual computing. The transition process that makes virtualized execution environments possible is controlled by the underlying software apparatus known as a hypervisor. Based on the design architecture and configuration, hypervisors differ in the degree of virtual machine isolation, making security a serious concern for technology adopters. This paper presents the security assessment of open-source hypervisors using attack vectors for guest-to-guest (G2G) and host-to-guest (H2G) penetrations. The study uses Proxmox VE and XenServer for Type 1 hypervisors and Kernel Virtual Machine (KVM) and Oracle Virtual Box (OVB) for Type 2, with secondary data analysis based on software vulnerabilities and exposures retrieved from publicly available online databases. For clarity, the source codes of each hypervisor were scanned to identify vulnerable files in an experiment conducted on a Kali Linux testbed with prebuilt virtual machines, each hosting one hypervisor. The vulnerability level was determined using 11 attack vectors extracted qualitatively from relevant literature. The soft memory management unit was found to be the most common attack vector among all hypervisors. Type 1 hypervisors are far better at responding to virtual resource attacks, whereas type 2 hypervisors are more vulnerable to attacks that suffocate computational resources, especially virtual CPUs. OVB outperforms other hypervisors in terms of disk and network performance as it is more resistant to attacks involving I/O networking, interrupt and timer mechanisms, and hypercalls. The results also show that all hypervisors perform better against G2G than H2G attacks. For H2G attacks, the Proxmox VE and KVM have demonstrated better performance compared to other hypervisors. According to analysis, the most prevalent hypervisor flaws are mainly due to design faults rather than misconfigurations by adopters. To get rid of hypervisor weaknesses and fully capitalize on the technological shift from physical to virtual computing, adopters should consider industry-accepted best practices when selecting, installing, and deploying open-source hypervisors.

Huria Journal of the Open University of TanzaniaVol. 30(2)
Open University of Tanzania (TZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Security and Verification in Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.