Polytope Typology B: Core–Shell, Core–Multi-shell, and Interlayer Configurations of the Polyhedra According to the Separation of Faces

In this paper, I apply my 2.5D cubic schema of polyhedra by the separation of faces (SoF), and rhombic schema of faces (RSoF), to generate core–shell and core–multi-shell geometries for Class II of {2,3,4} symmetry, with respect to the interlayer cells they generate. This morphology of polyhedra by symmetry class with the inclusion of a null element VP recognizes 8 Primary Polyhedra (PPs) (or Primary Polytopes, PTs) for each of 5 classes, 3×3D, and 2×2D. Each PP (or PT) consists of facial polytopes (FTs) that are considered to include 0-dimensional (0D) vertices (1-gons), and 1D edges (2-gons), as well as 2D polygons (n-gons), considering as principial only those PTs that lie normal to (or vertices (VTs) lying on) the axes of symmetry. By locating the smaller PP within the larger PP, core–shell configurations are then developed for pairs of concentric PPs that share an edge of the cubic (zonahedral) schema, where both are of unit edge length, and coaxial, sharing common negative (−ve), neutral (ntrl), and positive (+ve) axes. In the exemplary Class II, these conveniently correspond to the facial, mid-edge, and verticial axes of the cube ((100), (110), & (111)), respectively. Restricting the pairings to the shared edges of the cubic schema abstracted from the SoF reduces the possible cases in each class from 56 to 12, so ensuring their compatibility. The interlayer between inner and outer PPs is then partitioned into radial prismatic (PRS), pyramidal (PYR), and truncated pyramidal ‘frustal’(TFM) (i.e., cupola) elements of (0, α | β, or 2) frequency/orientation according to the FT (Fig. 1), where 0 refers to the VT; α | β in the −ve and +ve cases to facial rotation (truncation), α being the FT of frequency n of the polar (OH or CB), β of the quasi-regular (CO), and in the ntrl case, α | β refer to the PL+–PL– orientations of ntrl edges (EG)s; and 2 refers to the 2n double frequency case. Inner VTs project to outer VTs, NEs, or n-gons to form 0-PRSs, ntrl 2-PYRs, or n-PYRs, respectively; inner NEs project to outer NEs or squares (SQs) to form 2-PRSs or 2-TFMsm respectively; and inner n-gons project to outer n-gons or 2n-gons to form n-PRSs or n-TFMs, respectively, while 2n-gons project to 2n-gons to form n-PRSs. These are all radial, on the main symmetry axes, and combine to fill the interlayer space. The heights of these elements are derivable from the inradii of the concentric PPs, and show constant increase by gender and axis of the cubic schema. Core–multi-shell configurations are also developed, by abstracting 4 or 3 consecutive sequences of coaxially aligned, concentric PPs from the cubic schema, thus using the core VP and/or outer GR, respectively; each of the 3 or 2 interlayers thus formed is completely filled by the corresponding PRS, PYR, and TFM elements. The geometries developed might find application to nanoarchitecture, e.g., of electrode catalysts, and in space structures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Information
Published
2025-06-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47880/inf2802-01
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polytope Typology B: Core–Shell, Core–Multi-shell, and Interlayer Configurations of the Polyhedra According to the Separation of Faces

Robert C. Meurant
2 citations
Information
Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
7.08
article

Polytope Typology B: Core–Shell, Core–Multi-shell, and Interlayer Configurations of the Polyhedra According to the Separation of Faces

Robert C. Meurant
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this paper, I apply my 2.5D cubic schema of polyhedra by the separation of faces (SoF), and rhombic schema of faces (RSoF), to generate core–shell and core–multi-shell geometries for Class II of {2,3,4} symmetry, with respect to the interlayer cells they generate. This morphology of polyhedra by symmetry class with the inclusion of a null element VP recognizes 8 Primary Polyhedra (PPs) (or Primary Polytopes, PTs) for each of 5 classes, 3×3D, and 2×2D. Each PP (or PT) consists of facial polytopes (FTs) that are considered to include 0-dimensional (0D) vertices (1-gons), and 1D edges (2-gons), as well as 2D polygons (n-gons), considering as principial only those PTs that lie normal to (or vertices (VTs) lying on) the axes of symmetry. By locating the smaller PP within the larger PP, core–shell configurations are then developed for pairs of concentric PPs that share an edge of the cubic (zonahedral) schema, where both are of unit edge length, and coaxial, sharing common negative (−ve), neutral (ntrl), and positive (+ve) axes. In the exemplary Class II, these conveniently correspond to the facial, mid-edge, and verticial axes of the cube ((100), (110), & (111)), respectively. Restricting the pairings to the shared edges of the cubic schema abstracted from the SoF reduces the possible cases in each class from 56 to 12, so ensuring their compatibility. The interlayer between inner and outer PPs is then partitioned into radial prismatic (PRS), pyramidal (PYR), and truncated pyramidal ‘frustal’(TFM) (i.e., cupola) elements of (0, α | β, or 2) frequency/orientation according to the FT (Fig. 1), where 0 refers to the VT; α | β in the −ve and +ve cases to facial rotation (truncation), α being the FT of frequency n of the polar (OH or CB), β of the quasi-regular (CO), and in the ntrl case, α | β refer to the PL+–PL– orientations of ntrl edges (EG)s; and 2 refers to the 2n double frequency case. Inner VTs project to outer VTs, NEs, or n-gons to form 0-PRSs, ntrl 2-PYRs, or n-PYRs, respectively; inner NEs project to outer NEs or squares (SQs) to form 2-PRSs or 2-TFMsm respectively; and inner n-gons project to outer n-gons or 2n-gons to form n-PRSs or n-TFMs, respectively, while 2n-gons project to 2n-gons to form n-PRSs. These are all radial, on the main symmetry axes, and combine to fill the interlayer space. The heights of these elements are derivable from the inradii of the concentric PPs, and show constant increase by gender and axis of the cubic schema. Core–multi-shell configurations are also developed, by abstracting 4 or 3 consecutive sequences of coaxially aligned, concentric PPs from the cubic schema, thus using the core VP and/or outer GR, respectively; each of the 3 or 2 interlayers thus formed is completely filled by the corresponding PRS, PYR, and TFM elements. The geometries developed might find application to nanoarchitecture, e.g., of electrode catalysts, and in space structures.

InformationVol. 28(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
7.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.