Dynamic versus static LED-lighting for inpatients with major depression: Long-term antidepressant effects and short-term sleep improvement in a randomized controlled clinical trial

Translational research has shown a profound impact of daylight and electrical lighting on circadian rhythms, sleep, mood, and alertness. Dynamic LED-lighting can mimic daily and seasonal changes in daylight by continuous changes in intensity and spectral distribution throughout the 24-hour day. The current study assessed the clinical effect of dynamic LED-lighting in a randomized controlled setup. In an affective disorders ward, 10 single patient rooms were fitted with a dynamic LED-lighting system, replacing the existing lighting, able to switch between a dynamic or a static mode. In the dynamic mode, daytime Melanopic Daylight Equivalent Illuminance (M-EDI) peaked at 10:30h with 576 lx M-EDI vs. 66 lx in the static mode. During the evening, the dynamic mode gradually reduced intensity to 0.3 lx M-EDI, with the static mode staying at 66 lx. Patients with major depression were randomly allocated to a static or a dynamic lighting mode in their room, lasting three weeks, with weekly assessments, and after 6 months. The primary outcome was the change in scores on the HAM-D6 scale from baseline to week 3. In all, 60 patients were included in the study with a 96.7% follow-up of the primary outcome. On the 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D<sub>6</sub>) scale, a significantly greater antidepressant effect of the dynamic light was seen at week 3 for females (71%) (<i>p</i> = 0.02), but not for the whole group (<i>p</i> = 0.47). At 6 months, a significantly greater effect of dynamic light was seen for the whole group (<i>p</i> = 0.03). Sleep diaries showed significantly longer sleep (<i>p</i> = 0.02), fewer awakenings (<i>p</i> = 0.04), and later sleep offset (<i>p</i> = 0.03) with dynamic light, for the whole group. The dynamic lighting system was well functioning. Participants were most satisfied with the dynamic light. These findings should be tested in larger studies with measurement of individual light exposure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chronobiology International
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2025.2530129
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic versus static LED-lighting for inpatients with major depression: Long-term antidepressant effects and short-term sleep improvement in a randomized controlled clinical trial

Klaus Martiny, Ulla Knorr, Helle Østergaard Madsen, Carlo Volf et al.
1 citations
Chronobiology International
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
0.91
article

Dynamic versus static LED-lighting for inpatients with major depression: Long-term antidepressant effects and short-term sleep improvement in a randomized controlled clinical trial

Klaus Martiny, Ulla Knorr, Helle Østergaard Madsen, Carlo Volf, Carsten Dam‐Hansen, Ida Hageman, Ema Erkocevic Petersen, Janus Engstrøm, Paul Michael Petersen, Anne Sofie Aggestrup, Torben Skov Hansen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Translational research has shown a profound impact of daylight and electrical lighting on circadian rhythms, sleep, mood, and alertness. Dynamic LED-lighting can mimic daily and seasonal changes in daylight by continuous changes in intensity and spectral distribution throughout the 24-hour day. The current study assessed the clinical effect of dynamic LED-lighting in a randomized controlled setup. In an affective disorders ward, 10 single patient rooms were fitted with a dynamic LED-lighting system, replacing the existing lighting, able to switch between a dynamic or a static mode. In the dynamic mode, daytime Melanopic Daylight Equivalent Illuminance (M-EDI) peaked at 10:30h with 576 lx M-EDI vs. 66 lx in the static mode. During the evening, the dynamic mode gradually reduced intensity to 0.3 lx M-EDI, with the static mode staying at 66 lx. Patients with major depression were randomly allocated to a static or a dynamic lighting mode in their room, lasting three weeks, with weekly assessments, and after 6 months. The primary outcome was the change in scores on the HAM-D6 scale from baseline to week 3. In all, 60 patients were included in the study with a 96.7% follow-up of the primary outcome. On the 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D<sub>6</sub>) scale, a significantly greater antidepressant effect of the dynamic light was seen at week 3 for females (71%) (<i>p</i> = 0.02), but not for the whole group (<i>p</i> = 0.47). At 6 months, a significantly greater effect of dynamic light was seen for the whole group (<i>p</i> = 0.03). Sleep diaries showed significantly longer sleep (<i>p</i> = 0.02), fewer awakenings (<i>p</i> = 0.04), and later sleep offset (<i>p</i> = 0.03) with dynamic light, for the whole group. The dynamic lighting system was well functioning. Participants were most satisfied with the dynamic light. These findings should be tested in larger studies with measurement of individual light exposure.

Chronobiology InternationalVol. 42(9)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Aarhus University (DK), Mental Health Services (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), University College Copenhagen (DK), Capital Region of Denmark (DK), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Dansk Energi, Lundbeckfonden, Region Hovedstaden, Energistyrelsen, Grosserer L. F. Foghts Fond, H. Lundbeck A/S
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
0.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.