Necessary Antecedents of Supply Chain Resilience: The Nonnegotiable Influence of Supply Chain Responsiveness and Collaboration

ABSTRACT According to the social‐ecological systems view, a resilient supply chain possesses the ability to persist, adapt, and transform in the face of disruptions. Extant research has identified a range of antecedents that foster supply chain resilience but without distinguishing between those that are sufficient and those that are necessary. While altering sufficient antecedents might affect resilience, their absence does not preclude it because of the potential compensatory effects of other factors. Conversely, necessary antecedents are indispensable, as their absence prevents the realization of resilience, a scenario that cannot be rectified by modifying other antecedents. Grounded in dynamic capabilities theory, this research hypothesized that supply chain visibility, responsiveness, flexibility, and collaboration are necessary antecedents of supply chain resilience. To empirically test this, the research applied Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) to survey data from 479 manufacturing firms in Australia. The results indicate that only supply chain responsiveness and collaboration are necessary antecedents. A bottleneck analysis was also undertaken to determine how much supply chain collaboration and responsiveness is needed to achieve different levels of supply chain resilience. The research proposes a two‐tiered maturity model—Tier 1 (necessary) capabilities versus Tier 2 (contributory) capabilities—for building supply chain resilience and extends dynamic capabilities theory by demonstrating that specific capabilities may be nonnegotiable for enhancing sensing, seizing, and resource‐reconfiguration capacities. The research provides managerial guidance for determining how limited organizational resources can be most efficiently deployed to handle disruptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Supply Chain Management
Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.70000
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Necessary Antecedents of Supply Chain Resilience: The Nonnegotiable Influence of Supply Chain Responsiveness and Collaboration

Ethan Nikookar, Mark Stevenson, Imran Ali, Sajjad Shokouhyar
8 citations
Journal of Supply Chain Management
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
17.81
article

Necessary Antecedents of Supply Chain Resilience: The Nonnegotiable Influence of Supply Chain Responsiveness and Collaboration

Ethan Nikookar, Mark Stevenson, Imran Ali, Sajjad Shokouhyar
article en
8 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT According to the social‐ecological systems view, a resilient supply chain possesses the ability to persist, adapt, and transform in the face of disruptions. Extant research has identified a range of antecedents that foster supply chain resilience but without distinguishing between those that are sufficient and those that are necessary. While altering sufficient antecedents might affect resilience, their absence does not preclude it because of the potential compensatory effects of other factors. Conversely, necessary antecedents are indispensable, as their absence prevents the realization of resilience, a scenario that cannot be rectified by modifying other antecedents. Grounded in dynamic capabilities theory, this research hypothesized that supply chain visibility, responsiveness, flexibility, and collaboration are necessary antecedents of supply chain resilience. To empirically test this, the research applied Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) to survey data from 479 manufacturing firms in Australia. The results indicate that only supply chain responsiveness and collaboration are necessary antecedents. A bottleneck analysis was also undertaken to determine how much supply chain collaboration and responsiveness is needed to achieve different levels of supply chain resilience. The research proposes a two‐tiered maturity model—Tier 1 (necessary) capabilities versus Tier 2 (contributory) capabilities—for building supply chain resilience and extends dynamic capabilities theory by demonstrating that specific capabilities may be nonnegotiable for enhancing sensing, seizing, and resource‐reconfiguration capacities. The research provides managerial guidance for determining how limited organizational resources can be most efficiently deployed to handle disruptions.

Journal of Supply Chain ManagementVol. 61(4)
University of Wollongong (AU), Australian Institute of Business (AU), Lancaster University (GB), Central Queensland University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
17.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.